Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cheap Drugs of Canada Myth
Forbes Magazine | Feb 03, 2003 Issue | Ira Carnahan

Posted on 01/25/2003 9:22:28 AM PST by yankeedame

The Cheap Drugs Myth

by Ira Carnahan, 02.03.03

Canada is offered up as proof that price controls would dramatically cut the cost of medicine. The proof has some holes.

In Canada a three-month prescription for Merck's cholesterol reducer Zocor goes for $172. In the U.S., patients who pay retail fork over $328 for the same pills. The media are full of such shocking comparisons aimed at demonstrating that Canadians, thanks to price controls, pay far less for medicine than do Americans. Just one problem: It isn't so. While some high-profile brand name drugs are much cheaper in Canada, other lesser-known drugs and generics are not. In fact, 21 of 27 top-selling generics cost more in Canada than in the U.S., reports a study of lowest available prices by Palmer D'Angelo Consulting, an Ottawa firm that works for brand-ed drugmakers. For all 27 combined, the average Canadian premium is 37%. Why? Just two companies dominate the Canadian generics market, says study coauthor Neil Palmer.

That lack of competition is, ironically, partly a side effect of Canadian drug-price controls. Generic makers find countries with controls on patented drugs less attractive. So fewer jump in when a branded drug goes off patent. The end result: In the U.S., generic drugs cost an average of 74% less than equivalent brand name drugs; in Canada, generics average just 38% less.

Canada's rules can also discourage branded drugmakers from discounting older drugs to compete. John R. Graham of the Fraser Institute in Vancouver explains why: Canada's Patented Medicine Prices Review Board typically sets the maximum price for a new drug by comparing it with similar drugs already on the market. So if companies lowered prices on old drugs, that could cut into profits on new ones, too.

How did the myth of cheap Canadian drugs gain such wide acceptance? It began with a 1992 study by Congress' General Accounting Office and was reinforced by a 1998 report from the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Government Reform. Both studies were flawed. They compared only top-selling brand-name drugs, ignoring lower-priced generics that now make up half of U.S. prescriptions. Furthermore, prices in the studies weren't properly weighted to reflect market share or volume discounts, argues Wharton School health economist Patricia Danzon. Correcting for such flaws, Danzon and Li-Wei Chao, also of Wharton, found that if Americans had paid Canadian prices for the drugs they bought in 1992, they would have saved, at most, 13%.

Yes, the Wharton economists have received research funding from the drug industry, and yes, the price break Canadians enjoy has likely widened since 1992. But it's doubtful that Canada's price controls on patented drugs, as opposed to economics, are the main cause of lower prices there.

The truth is, notes the Fraser Institute's Graham, all kinds of goods cost more in the U.S. than Canada. A turbo Chrysler PT Cruiser retails for $23,100 in the U.S. and the equivalent of $17,800 up north. Yet there's no Canadian Retro Car Prices Review Board. Even bigger price differences are common for goods with high fixed costs but lower variable costs, everything from music CDs to online service. Prices are lower in Canada because incomes there are a fifth smaller and the Canadian dollar is weaker. Producers logically try to recoup most of their high fixed costs from wealthier consumers and charge those who can't pay as much a price closer to marginal cost.

There's another reason for lower drug prices in Canada: lower liability costs. In Canada, judges--not juries--typically set damages, and awards for pain and suffering are capped at $185,000 U.S. Such differences account for a third to a half of the gap, a 1997 study in the Journal of Law and Economics concluded. Yet the politicians and do-gooders who complain most about U.S. drug prices are often the least likely to favor reining in legal costs.

Bargains, South of the Border

Generic(Brand Name) Type U.S. Price vs.Canada Price

--Amoxicillin(Amoxil) Antibiotic 49% less --
Atenolol(Tenormin) Beta-blocker 86% less --
Minocycline (Minocin) Antibiotic 21% less --
Naproxen (Naprosyn) Anti-inflammatory 36% less --
Verapamil (Calan) Calcium channel blocker 43% less

Sources: "Generic Drug Prices," Palmer D'Angelo Consulting, Aug. 2002.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: socializedmedicine

1 posted on 01/25/2003 9:22:28 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Thanks. Good ammo against the national medical care promoters.
2 posted on 01/25/2003 9:32:08 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I am sure they reaserched this thouroughly, but I take several medicines, and have found the "myth" to be true.

I lost my insurance, and now I have to pay retail. I checked Canadian online pharmacies against their American counterparts (as well as local pharmacies) and found each drug, including generics, to be at least 40% cheaper.

I don't advocate price controls, but I'll take advantage of Canada's.
3 posted on 01/25/2003 10:01:52 AM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
I gave up on my premium medical coverage because it just cost too much and the service wasn't very good. I actually had doctors refuse to treat me because they said that they wouldn't get paid by my insurer! I'm now paying cash for my medical needs, and the price of some prescription drugs is astonishing! If I can get the same medications for %40 less in Canada, then by golly I'm going to buy them in Canada. Besides, I'm only a couple of hours from the border, so it's a day trip there and back.
4 posted on 01/25/2003 10:13:55 AM PST by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *Socialized Medicine
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
5 posted on 01/25/2003 10:14:54 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Popcorn costs a lot in movie theaters -- it is a form of price discrimination -- yet it works to subsidize ticket prices so more can affort to see the movies on the backs of those who gotta have their popcorn.

Similarly, the cost of discovering and approving drugs is staggering -- and a lot of them fail. Someone has to pay that upfront cost -- and that is going to be those who can afford it -- the citizens of the most productive country in the world -- the US.

The actual cost of producing the drugs is only a fraction of the total cost of bringing it to market. Therefore if there are markets where they can still sell above production cost, it makes sense to sell it there as well.

Now it seems like the US is subsidizing the rest of the world, and it is, in a sense.

But the reverse is true too -- for every extra penny of profit made in the rest of the world, that is that much less the drug companies have to charge US consumers. So it is really a bi-directional subsidy.

6 posted on 01/25/2003 10:28:51 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
Maybe try acupuncture instead??? (sarcasm off)
7 posted on 01/25/2003 1:41:40 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob

If you look into this a litle, you may find that your doc, like mine, is indifferent to prices and could be prescribing more economically, if you ask.


8 posted on 11/26/2006 6:13:58 AM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson