Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Pro-life Movement Stays Young
Zenit via Google ^ | 2-24-2003 | staff

Posted on 01/26/2003 12:44:01 PM PST by Notwithstanding

Young people are now the heart of the pro-life movement in the United States, says an analyst on life issues.

...

Studies consistently show that Generation Y -- 8 to 23 years [old] -- is decidedly a pro-life generation which understands the decision to complete a crisis pregnancy as a confident and brave thing to do.

(Excerpt) Read more at zenit.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
U.S. Pro-life Movement Stays Young

Family Research Council's Pia de Solenni Views the Scene

WASHINGTON, D.C., JAN. 24, 2003 (Zenit.org).- Young people are now the heart of the pro-life movement in the United States, says an analyst on life issues.

On the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, Pia de Solenni, a fellow of the Center for Human Life and Bioethics at the Family Research Council, outlined for ZENIT the prospects for the U.S. pro-life movement.

De Solenni was awarded the Pontifical Prize of the Academies by John Paul II in 2001.

Q: There are fewer abortions in the United States, and a more-or-less pro-life Republican Party controls Washington now. Yet the culture of death is being institutionalized elsewhere -- note the Stanford University research center that aims to rely on human cloning. Where is the country going on the pro-life issue?

De Solenni: Thirty years after Roe v. Wade was decided, almost every American knows someone who has had an abortion or has been somehow involved in an abortion. As a result, pro-life issues are becoming mainstream.

Studies consistently show that Generation Y -- 8 to 23 years [old] -- is decidedly a pro-life generation which understands the decision to complete a crisis pregnancy as a confident and brave thing to do.

Single parenthood, for better or for worse, has lost the stigma once associated with it. Prime-time shows basing story lines on unplanned/inconvenient pregnancies generally do not even include the option of abortion -- see NBC's "Friends" and MTV's "Real World."

A recent Wirthlin Poll shows that 68% of the American public supports protections on the lives of the unborn. Last week's CNN/USA Today poll showed 70% of Americans support a ban on partial-birth abortion as well as other abortion regulations.

Now we need to harness this pro-life shift in public opinion so that institutions like Stanford understand that any endeavor which does not respect the dignity of every human life will not be supported or tolerated. The voice of the more than two-thirds majority needs to be heard by donors and supporters at every institution, including Stanford University. Each person has the opportunity to make his or her voice heard within their various communities. All we have to do is seize that opportunity.

Q: What are the prospects for abortion restrictions in the new Congress?

De Solenni: We are cautiously optimistic. There are five pro-life legislative priorities facing the 108th Congress:

First, a ban on all forms of human cloning. President Bush has clearly stated that he opposes all forms of human cloning. Similarly, Senate Majority Leader [Bill] Frist has said that he will support a complete ban. Last March the House passed a complete ban on cloning. Unfortunately, the legislation never moved to the Senate and, hence, the process had to start over in this new session of Congress. The ban has already been introduced in the House where it is expected to pass. Then it remains to be seen if Senate leadership and the White House will be able to get it passed in the Senate.

Second, a ban on partial-birth abortion. This legislation passed in both the House and the Senate twice during the Clinton administration. It was vetoed both times by President Clinton. If it comes to a vote, we expect that it will pass, as it is a bipartisan issue with overwhelming support from both Republicans and Democrats.

Third, the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act. This legislation would protect doctors and medical institutions from being forced to offer abortion services. It has passed in the House before. We expect it to pass again. However, as with all of these bills, the question is whether or not we have Senate leadership which can generate positive results.

Fourth, the Child Custody Protection Act. This would prevent someone who is not the parent or guardian of a minor from taking her out of state -- and into a state where neither parental consent or notification are required -- for an abortion. In effect, it protects young victims of sexual abuse from the adult men who prey on them. This bill has also passed in the House and is expected to pass again. But we need Senate action to make it effective.

Fifth, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. This legislation makes clear that when a pregnant woman is the victim of assault and her unborn child is injured or killed, that unborn child is also recognized as a victim in our legal system. This, too, has previously passed in the House, but never made the Senate floor.

Pro-life Americans must hold their elected representatives accountable to the pro-life views of those whom they represent -- that is, write, call, fax and e-mail them. None of these bills explicitly attacks the "right" to abortion, but they would protect those who could be affected by abortion. These views are far from extreme. Beginning with our families, friends and daily contacts we need to communicate that these are mainstream views. Generation Y gets it, the rest of us can learn from them.

Q: How has 30 years of abortion affected the country's psyche? Its family life? Relations between the sexes?

De Solenni: There's been an undeniable increase in domestic abuse and family breakdown. Sexuality has come to be expressed in almost exclusively masculine terms. Motherhood has been divorced from feminine sexuality -- and identity.

But coming out of this all are a new pro-life generation and movement that are motivated because of their lived experience. Every one of us has experienced the culture of death and the denial of authentic femininity and masculinity.

More than simply knowing the moral rules, so to speak, we have learned them through our experiences. It's the school of hard knocks. It hurts, but it's working. The culture of life will be built on our experiences and our refusal of the culture of death.

Q: Where do you see young people on the pro-life issue?

De Solenni: They're the heart of it. Every one of them survived Roe v. Wade just by being born. They know that 42 million of their American brothers, sisters and friends are missing. Their commitments to pro-life values, including abstinence and chastity, witness the fact that they have not forgotten a single one of the 42 million dead.

Young people are developing a unique ability to be in the culture without being suffocated by it. They are mainstreaming positions that have wrongly been labeled extreme, conservative, etc.

Q: What was the biggest mistake of the U.S. pro-life movement? The biggest disappointment? The biggest success?

De Solenni: Like probably every human endeavor, the U.S. pro-life movement has at times given into egoism and disunity. We were committed to winning, but we took awhile to become seriously professional about our work.

As the movement grows, we're losing our rough edges and we're honing our skills to win the game. The fact that abortion is still an extremely divisive issue even after 30 years shows that the movement has been very successful.

We haven't given up and we're not giving in. I think, too, we've advanced because we've been able to start communicating that we're just as concerned about women as we are about their unborn children.

1 posted on 01/26/2003 12:44:01 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Very nice article, which makes a lot of sense.
Where do you see young people on the pro-life issue?

De Solenni: They're the heart of it. Every one of them survived Roe v. Wade just by being born. They know that 42 million of their American brothers, sisters and friends are missing.


2 posted on 01/26/2003 12:50:51 PM PST by syriacus (Those who attempt to cool the earth would bring freezing death to the poor and homeless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This doesn't surprise me. I've been supporting the organization called Survivors, young people who have been doing excellent work spreading the word, especially in schools and colleges.

For the most part, the Countercultural Revolution is being run by aging men and women who seized the levers of power during the seventies and have been making mischief ever since. They have managed to brainwash some younger intellectuals into following them, but they are not the wave of the future.

It's not entirely coincidental that the Democrats had to turn to people like Lautenberg and Mondale in the last election. Liberalism is running out of steam. Other than lies, the only thing it has to offer is power, and the desire for sheer power and manipulation doesn't attract the best young people coming of age.
3 posted on 01/26/2003 1:08:32 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
"Where do you see young people on the pro-life issue?
De Solenni: They're the heart of it. Every one of them survived Roe v. Wade just by being born. They know that 42 million of their American brothers, sisters and friends are missing."

BINGO! You are right on the money in sifting out this segment of the post.

I always point out to Gen Xer's and Yer's that my generation, the Boomers, have methodically killed about half of their generation. In addition, when the time comes to footing the bill for the Boomer's golden years social security, the tax burden on the X&Yer's will be double what it should be simply because we wanted our leisure, money and convenience. I wonder what their retribution will be?

Soylent Green anyone?
4 posted on 01/26/2003 1:28:47 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
It's the sonogram's that are doing it, I think. I went from mildly to rabidly pro-life upon seeing my daugheters 2 month sonogram, and a few of my friends have gone from pro-choice to pro-life upon seeing their child's sonogram.
5 posted on 01/26/2003 1:30:25 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I am 20 years old and a hardcore pro-life supporter.
I know many conservatives my age who are also pro-life.
6 posted on 01/26/2003 2:00:57 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I'm 18 and i'm 100% pro-life. You'd be surprised to see the amount of pro-life people my age.
7 posted on 01/26/2003 2:04:53 PM PST by JohnnyRidden (It is better to die free than to submit to tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I hear from a lot of young people who claim a pro-life position, but I also see a strong counter-force operating in today's youth culture. The Sexual Revolution has made early sexual expression and late (often very late) marriage the norm. The typical clinic patron is an unmarried 20-something, often with shack-up boyfriend in tow, who just isn't quite ready to grow up. From talking with some of them, I know they say they really want to be pro-life BUT . . .
8 posted on 01/26/2003 2:25:12 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I encourage my fellow FReepers to give generously to the Pro-Life Movement. One can make out a check to the lobbying arm of your state's pro-life activity, or to its educational arm (which is tax-deductible), or even both. And if you have time off from work, what better thing to do than contribute time and effort to the Pro-Life movement. Happy to say, this is one culture war which we are winning.
9 posted on 01/26/2003 2:31:18 PM PST by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I'm 22 and I'm 100% pro-life! I've been on 5 Marches for Life, and the pro-life cause was the first conservative cause I got involved with. It was the baby brother of liberal Bill Press who showed me "The Silent Scream" when he was my Christian Morality teacher in high school who got me to become pro-life. It's amazing to see the amount of young people who are involved in the pro-life activism, even if some people just go on the March to get out of school. I'm sure the vast majority do go to support babies! Indeed, George Weigel, in a recent article about Colleen Carroll's book, "The New Faithful: Why Young People are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy," said the following:
"Gen X "new faithful" are passionately pro-life; indeed, as Carroll points out, one of the striking (and virtually unreported) phenomena of American politics today is that the pro-abortion forces are getting older and greyer while the pro-life world is displaying a much younger face." (Taken from "Young, smart, successful...and passionately orthodox")

I think we should have much hope that we will turn back the tide of the Culture of Death, and overturn Roe v. Wade.

10 posted on 01/26/2003 2:40:40 PM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
I am encouraged (and happily surprised) by the number of young folks who value life.

I've wondered if (among other things) the young adults notice the distinct contradiction between

It's difficult to value and devalue the same thing at the same time.

11 posted on 01/26/2003 2:43:12 PM PST by syriacus (Those who attempt to cool the earth would bring freezing death to the poor and homeless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; JohnnyRidden; ConservativeMan55
I am so very proud of you.

Thank you for working so hard to undo what my STUPID generation did.
12 posted on 01/26/2003 3:20:07 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (Only YOU can free Snuggles $5 a month is all it takes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I am sorely afraid that it is the "baby boom" generation of which I am a member that will forever bear the mark of responsibility for what is the greatest horror of all times.
13 posted on 01/26/2003 3:38:45 PM PST by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dionysius
Since when is a generation 15 years?

A generation is 30 years meaning most
of the so called generation Y is actually
part of generation X and not a different generation.

But the point that a social change trend seems
to forming is still valid regardless of that
but I wish the media would get a few things
straight.

14 posted on 01/26/2003 5:27:16 PM PST by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dionysius
The judges who made Roe vs. Wade legal
and the vast majority of politians in power in the 70s
were the WWII and not the baby boomers.
The WWII generation is the one that turned
its back on morality and the baby boomers
then followed suit in a huge way
but the shift actually happened with the WWII
generation.
The WWII generation not the greatest generation.
The founding fathers were the greatest generation.

15 posted on 01/26/2003 5:29:31 PM PST by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
ditto....19 and feel the same way. I only have run into one pro-choicer in my college so far (though I am sure there are more). One girl I know has the "liberal radical look" to her, but is actually pretty conservative and is pro-life.
16 posted on 01/26/2003 5:39:17 PM PST by rwfromkansas (What is the chief end of man? To glorify God and enjoy Him forever. --- Westminster Catechism Q1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I support the overturning of Roe v Wade and the federal banning of partial-birth abortion. I'm 21.
17 posted on 01/26/2003 7:43:30 PM PST by College Repub (http://www.collegehumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; sandyeggo; fatima; AKA Elena; Domestic Church; livius; redhead; saradippity; ...
Excellent post.

BUMP for the Culture of Life and an end to legalized butchering of babies!

18 posted on 01/26/2003 7:58:39 PM PST by Siobhan (+ Irish Catholic Mothers, the Fiercest Army on Earth +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
I'm caught in the middle, sort of, age wise (being younger than the baby-boom and older than the kids currently in college), but the pro-life trend was not nearly as strong among people my age when we were in high school and college. Quite the opposite. It was not easy finding pro-life people around. Even now, among people my age it's not nearly as wide-spread as among the younger crowd.

I'm glad it's growing among the young. And may the Good Lord Bless us with plenty to continue the movement.
19 posted on 01/26/2003 8:03:40 PM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I am another young person involved in the pro-life movement. I pray that one day Roe v. Wade is overturned.
20 posted on 01/26/2003 8:10:35 PM PST by ConservativeTeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson