Posted on 01/27/2003 9:06:48 AM PST by Clive
European Union foreign ministers have failed to decide on a new package of sanctions against the government of Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe at a meeting in Brussels.
The EU's Greek Presidency said the matter had been referred on to EU ambassadors in order to try to reach consensus.
The measures currently in force include a travel ban on senior government figures, but France has invited Mr Mugabe to a Franco-African summit in Paris next month, angering several countries.
France argues that EU sanctions against Zimbabwe allow officials to attend meetings in Europe if the focus is on human rights and democracy.
England cricketers on Monday said for the first time they did not want to play a World Cup match in Zimbabwe, after some players received letters threatening violence.
Citing safety and security concerns, the England team told reporters it had asked for the 13 February match to be played in South Africa.
Within Europe, there is a split over whether Mr Mugabe should be allowed to travel to Paris.
The UK and a number of other countries - including Sweden and the Netherlands - want to keep Mr Mugabe out.
The EU travel ban, along with a freeze on Mr Mugabe's assets, was imposed last February as violence flared in the run-up to a presidential election which was later widely condemned as unfair.
Compromise?
Supporters of sanctions fear that if the Zimbabwean leader is prevented from travelling to Paris, France will allow the entire sanctions regime to lapse.
Sanctions are due to expire on 18 February - just one day before the Franco- African summit begins.
France argues other African nations would boycott the gathering if Mr Mugabe is not invited.
There were already concerns about Mr Mugabe attending an EU-Africa summit in April before the latest dilemma arose.
This had led to some EU members seeking a compromise that would have seen Zimbabwe's Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge attend the summit in Lisbon in his place - although the minister would also need a travel waiver.
Confiscated
In Zimbabwe itself, police have been questioning five foreigners on suspicion of being journalists who entered the country under false pretences.
The five - from Finland, Germany, Kenya and the US - say they are church workers reporting on development projects for church magazines.
One of them, Kathleen Kastilahn, said their mission had been "very open", with no attempt to hide what they would be doing.
"But obviously they are not treating us as church workers. They have confiscated our passports, they are not allowing us to move or even exercise," she told Reuters news agency.
Under tough new media laws Zimbabwe introduced last year, journalists working without permission can be jailed for up to two years.
Correspondents say, however, that in-house publications such as church magazines are exempt.
You must surrender now, before we surrender for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.