Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Could Usher in Hydrogen Age as Kennedy Did Space Age
glennsacks.com ^ | Tuesday, January 28, 2003 | Glenn Sacks

Posted on 01/28/2003 9:05:52 PM PST by new cruelty

George W. Bush today has the opportunity to usher in the Hydrogen Age--the coming era of non-polluting, limitless hydrogen fuel cell power--as John F. Kennedy did the Space Age. In so doing, he would be remembered as one of our nation’s greatest leaders.

The advantages of hydrogen fuel cell power over conventional fossil fuels are innumerable. Fuel cells emit no “Greenhouse Gases” or pollution of any kind. A fuel cell’s only emission is water vapor--water so pure that scientists routinely gather it in a glass and drink it. And the supply of hydrogen, the most abundant element in our world, is inexhaustible, and new and efficient ways of recovering it are being developed.

Today, nearly 200 fuel cell generators help power office buildings, hospitals, schools, utility power plants, and airports. Soon fuel cell generators large enough to power strip malls will go on the market, as will systems the size of a central air conditioning unit, which will meet an entire household's energy needs.

Hydrogen fuel cells, which have powered our rockets, spaceships, and space stations for decades, are not a fantasy of environmentalists and techno geeks. In fact, many of the leaders of the oil, auto, and power generation industries--including executives at Ford, Texaco, Shell, Daimler-Chrysler, Honda and General Motors--have voiced strong support for fuel cells.

The only significant problem with electricity from fuel cell generators is its cost, which is roughly two to three times that of conventional power. Yet even this obstacle is not inherent to fuel cell production, but is instead largely the result of a lack of an economy of scale.

To a business executive, who must focus on profits, the added cost of fuel cell power is usually prohibitive. But for America as a whole, and indeed humanity as a whole, the cost difference is relatively small. Why? Because price comparisons don’t account for the massive secondary cost of fossil fuels: air pollution, global warming, and the fact that our oil supply is finite.

In addition to fuel cell power plants, hydrogen and fuel cell powered automobiles are also feasible. For example, the hydrogen-powered luxury car recently unveiled by BMW, the 750hL sedan, can travel 200 miles at top speeds on one tank of fuel while emitting 1/200th of the emissions of a conventional car. Ford, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota are working on similar vehicles.

Here’s what Bush should do:

As Kennedy did with the race to the moon, Bush should announce that the U.S. will be the first nation to reach the Hydrogen Age. His initiative would feature:

(1) Subsidies to make fuel cell power plants and business and home-sized fuel cell generators substantially less expensive than conventional power sources;

(2) Research funds to resolve the hydrogen‑powered car's remaining technological kinks, which include fuel distribution and on-board fuel storage;

(3) An executive order mandating that, as of January 1, 2009, the U.S. government will only purchase fuel cell vehicles. Creating this large, protected market would give automakers a tremendous incentive to mass produce fuel cell cars. Bush’s plan would also include federal fiscal incentives for state and local governments to follow suit;

(4) A generous, long-term tax deduction for consumers and businesses who purchase fuel cell cars and power generators;

(5) Funds to find and perfect the optimum method of hydrogen fuel production.

Could this plan work politically? Yes, because it has something for everybody. For liberals, environmentalists, and world leaders angry over Bush’s rejection of the Kyoto treaty, Bush’s bold plan would immediately vault the U.S. far ahead of any other nation in solving environmental problems. Today Bush is scolded by foreign leaders and burned in effigy in European cities. With this plan, in six months he could be the one doing the scolding.

For national-security hawks, the fuel cell would free America from its dangerous dependence on foreign oil, while providing the US with permanent energy self-sufficiency.

For the average citizen, air pollution would be dramatically reduced, as would the anxiety that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren might face environmental disaster because of global warming.

For the business community, the Bush plan would give American companies the opportunity to leap ahead of foreign companies and be the first to perfect and internationally market fuel cell products.

And for Bush’s harshest critics--who deride him as a lucky but visionless mediocrity in the pocket of big business and big oil--the Hydrogen Age plan would create the boldest, most vital presidency in decades.

It took Nixon to go to China. Maybe it will take a Texas oil man to end our dependency upon fossil fuels and open up a new era of plentiful, non-polluting energy--the Hydrogen Age.

(Excerpt) Read more at glennsacks.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; economy; environment; hydrogen; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
Food for thought.
1 posted on 01/28/2003 9:05:53 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
This is how I know it was a great speech:
Speech This is a RealPlayer file.
2 posted on 01/28/2003 9:07:19 PM PST by GalvestonBeachcomber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Speaking of hydrogen - remember what happened to the Hindenburg. Oh the humanity!
3 posted on 01/28/2003 9:10:36 PM PST by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
HAH. nice. did you piece that together yourself?

I recall The Joker shaking her head when GWB was talking about taxes. I figured she would certainly have something to say about it later in the night.
4 posted on 01/28/2003 9:13:42 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
This article is definite socialist Kook bait.

TANSTAAFL!!!!
You only get out of hydrogen the energy you put into seperating it in the first place.

That said,
I found this the silliest part of Bush's speech- BUT>
It could lead to building atomic energy plants- as atomic energy is the only affordable way of powering a "hydrogen economy".

5 posted on 01/28/2003 9:15:47 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: new cruelty
I'm a big supporter of hydrogen power, but this is for private industry, not government.
7 posted on 01/28/2003 9:18:32 PM PST by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
The president may have the backbone to stand up to Iraq, but not to the eco-terrorists. He's taking the easy way out by firing up another multi-billion dollar government program.

Private companies have been working on this for years. All the government will do is keep throwing more and more of our tax dollars at it, if the market rejects it.

8 posted on 01/28/2003 9:20:17 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
When I heard him make reference to a child born today could leqarn to drive in a hydrogen powered car I immediately thought of JFK's challenge to ge to the moon before the end of the 60's.
9 posted on 01/28/2003 9:25:35 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Contra
Speaking of hydrogen - remember what happened to the Hindenburg. Oh the humanity!

Just imagine if that had been gasoline! The explosion would have leveled half fo North Jersey.

11 posted on 01/28/2003 9:27:05 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The market may have no choice but to go along. Don't laugh but I think its more feasible than the battery powered electric cars no one wants to buy because of their limitations and the fact you still have to take several hours in the garage to juice up the car before you can take it out for a spin. And the other factor that held up electric cars is the fact you can't really take long road trips with 'em. Personally this part of the speech went a long way to rebutting the enviro wackos and anti-war kooks on the Left who insist President Bush's sole motive for going to war with Iraq is for oil. Now that the President has proposed hydrogen fuel cell technology for cars, that's made the opposition look ridiculous and made the President look environmentally responsible.
12 posted on 01/28/2003 9:29:09 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
You only get out of hydrogen the energy you put into seperating it in the first place.

Yup...probably the same bunch of people who want to electrify every house in America. Everyone knows that's just plain foolishness. Dangerous, unhealthy and impossible!

13 posted on 01/28/2003 9:30:17 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
I have to disagree with you about this being a socialist idea. I am a strong conservative, but there is nothing socialist about liking clean air. I have been in Los Angeles and Houston and seen what smog is like. Even my home city of Dallas has its own cloud. I think many "conservatives" of today would have written off the Wright brothers, Henry Ford, Fulton, and many others as socialists, simply because they had new ideas. Just think, with this technology we could tell OPEC to collectivly jump in a lake. Many things we take for granted today, the Internet and commercial satellites just to name a couple, might never have gotten started without a push from the government.
14 posted on 01/28/2003 9:30:44 PM PST by LonghornFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gcochran
If you really want to misunderestimate Bush you can pretend that he can't see that a "hydrogen economy" requires nuclear power.

Of course you'd be stupidly wrong- but Bush haters never let being stupidly wrong get in the way of being snide and vacuous.

15 posted on 01/28/2003 9:31:06 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LonghornFreeper
My thoughts exactly. The market will never do it on its own but if the government gives it a big push, it'll happen. And our economy will be stronger and just think of the benefits of not having to import oil from a volatile region of the planet. All of which will enhance the quality of our environment, our standard of living, and our national security. Its what I would call environmentalism with a conservative tinge. Let's not cede clean air and pure water to the enviro wackos.
16 posted on 01/28/2003 9:34:33 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LonghornFreeper
"To a business executive, who must focus on profits, the added cost of fuel cell power is usually prohibitive. But for America as a whole, and indeed humanity as a whole, the cost difference is relatively small. Why? Because price comparisons don’t account for the massive secondary cost of fossil fuels: air pollution, global warming, and the fact that our oil supply is finite. "

That is what makes this article "socialist kook bait".

"with this technology we could tell OPEC to collectivly jump in a lake"
Sure, if the cost to the economy (you and me) is reasonable; using nuclear power the cost could be less than our energy cost now.

17 posted on 01/28/2003 9:38:48 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Contra
Oh the humanity!

Always makes me think of the WKRP in Cincinnati episode about the turkeys dropped from the helicopter. Oh the humanity!

18 posted on 01/28/2003 9:40:19 PM PST by Zebra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
I would like to see the greens announce opposition to this as they are to nuclear power.
19 posted on 01/28/2003 9:40:22 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"hydrogen, the most abundant element in our world"

It's the most abundant element in the universe.

on Earth:
atmosphere: nitrogen.
crust (by weight...believe it or not): oxygen.

20 posted on 01/28/2003 9:40:59 PM PST by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson