Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans 'Keep on Truckin' in Their SUVs
Houston Chronicle ^ | Jan. 29, 2003 | Reuters News Service

Posted on 01/29/2003 1:46:13 PM PST by Mark

Jan. 29, 2003, 10:41AM

Americans 'keep on truckin' in their SUVs

Reuters News Service

DETROIT -- Keep on truckin'!

That advice, straight from Detroit and the 1970s hit by the late Motown singer Eddie Kendricks, sums up the way many Americans feel about recent attacks on sport utility vehicles.

In a land where bigger is usually perceived as better, Americans love SUVs and their high-perch "command" seating. They're not going to give them up, and there's no sign that environmentalists and anti-SUV activists will succeed in driving the gas-guzzlers into the junkyard of history anytime soon.

In fact, thanks to a White House plan to provide more generous tax breaks for certain businesses that buy the biggest SUVs or pickup trucks, the sales of oversized vehicles with low gas mileage may even get a big boost in the near term.

Recent television ads from a Hollywood group led by nationally syndicated columnist and author Arianna Huffington, are pitching alleged links between Mideast oil profits and terrorism, trying to make owning an SUV sound tantamount to bankrolling Osama bin Laden.

A coalition of religious groups, including dozens of evangelical Christian organizations, sponsored another TV ad campaign late last year seeking to portray SUV owners as outcasts by asking "What Would Jesus Drive?"

The top U.S. auto safety regulator joined the fray this month by warning automakers that SUVs, which statistics show may be prone to roll over, may soon come under strict government controls.

Although the main concern about SUV safety centers on their higher susceptibility to roll over in crashes, critics say they also pose an increased danger in crashes with smaller cars, whose occupants are especially vulnerable in side impacts.

Nevertheless, traditional SUVs gained a larger piece of the U.S. vehicle market last year, and light trucks -- a category that includes pickups and minivans as well as SUVs -- account for more than half of the market overall.

Industry experts, meanwhile, say the anti-SUV crusade has failed to resonate with consumers, even as another U.S.-led war with Iraq looks set to push oil prices higher and add to the debate over America's seemingly insatiable appetite for crude.

"I like everything about it, the size, everything," said Detroit-based disc jockey Rocky Allen, as he climbed into the driver's seat of his Chevrolet Suburban SUV in the "oversized" section of an office parking lot recently.

"I'll be happy to drive an electric car when Arianna Huffington stops flying private jets and uses solar heat in her 5,000-square-foot home," Allen said, taking a shot at the political commentator and her so-called Detroit Project activist group.

That defiant reaction, to what many regard as "over-the-top" campaigns targeting SUVs since the late 1990s, is good news for Detroit automakers, since the vehicles are among their most profitable products.

Foreign automakers have also been muscling in on the full-size SUV segment, as part of their relentless assault on the U.S. market. But one of the hottest sellers in the segment since last year has been the massive, military-inspired Hummer H2, which dwarfs even Allen's lumbering Suburban. Both vehicles are made by General Motors Corp., the world's largest automaker.

'ME, MYSELF AND I'

George Pipas, head of sales and North American market analysis for Ford Motor Co. , says most SUV owners are aware of safety and fuel economy concerns about the vehicles.

But he said market research showed that consumers who own or intend to buy SUVs also tend to put their personal likes and comfort above issues such as vehicle stability and fuel consumption, and the recent flood of editorial commentary about the SUV backlash.

"They (consumers) are not going to respond to media reports, or campaigns like that; they seldom do," Pipas told Reuters. "They respond to what they want. It's their own pocketbook, and their own stomach. It's me, myself and I.

"I haven't seen anything in actual vehicle purchases that would suggest any of this is having an impact," he added.

Sean Kane of Strategic Safety, an Arlington, Virginia-based, automotive safety research firm, said consumers would probably steer away from SUVs in droves if they were better educated about their instability. But he said they are not well educated, and the government was partly to blame for that.

"There's this illusion that, if they (SUVs) were as bad as they're painted to be, that somehow or other the government would have taken action and they wouldn't be allowed on the road or something would have had to change," Kane said.

"Unfortunately that's just not the case," he added.

One factor may be the education of baby boomers, who started the U.S. craze for SUVs more than a decade ago.

But Art Spinella, a veteran auto industry analyst and president of Bandon, Oregon-based, CNW Marketing Research Inc., agreed with Ford's Pipas that SUV buyers tend to put their likes and personal interests above what others might perceive as the greater good.

"For all intents and purposes, they don't accept the notion that sport utilities are wasteful," Spinella said of the average SUV buyer. "They think that sport utilities use a disproportionate amount of gas but -- and there is the but -- they think it's justified in their own case."

He added that his own research, including a survey based on comments from thousands of consumers polled last week, showed that ads such as those from Huffington's group did nothing to affect SUV buying plans.

"People who buy them love them. People who buy them are sticking to the sport utility segment like crazy," Spinella said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: liberals; oil; suvs

1 posted on 01/29/2003 1:46:14 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark
"I'll be happy to drive an electric car when Arianna Huffington stops flying private jets and uses solar heat in her 5,000-square-foot home," Allen said, taking a shot at the political commentator and her so-called Detroit Project activist group.

I believe she has a 9,000 square foot house.

2 posted on 01/29/2003 1:49:33 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Whew, thank goodness I drive a modified camaro putting down 340 horses at 14 mpg so I don't incur the wrath of the Arianna.
3 posted on 01/29/2003 2:00:10 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad
But those mean SUVs might run over you-- even if there is no driver!
4 posted on 01/29/2003 2:02:59 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doodad
Yeah... big is beautiful and learn to love it on the road :)
5 posted on 01/29/2003 2:03:11 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Just bought my third Suburban -- love those cars. This anti-SUV campaign has only convinced me that my next SUV will be even bigger.
6 posted on 01/29/2003 2:45:15 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
As long as they stay inside the LINES, I have no complaints. It's not the vehicle . . . it's the superbly incompetent driver that I have a problem with.
7 posted on 01/29/2003 2:46:07 PM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
If I had the extra $$, I would buy a Hummer just to piss off the Green Weenies.
8 posted on 01/29/2003 2:50:51 PM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Hi Everyone

Let's see.

Argument one. There so big and heavy that if they crash into a smaller car the people in the smaller car will be hurt.

Answer to argument one. By that logic we would also need to get rid of full size cars, minivans, delivery trucks, 18 wheelers, fire trucks, ambulances, UPS and FedEx trucks as well. When do you think that's gonna happen.

Argument two. They use up more natural resources because they are bigger than small economy vehicles.

Answer to argument two. Then why only target SUV's? Haven't you seen all those minivans with only one person in it? By that logic, anytime you drive your small four seat economy car with only one person, you too have used more natural resources than you needed to.

It seems to me that the folks complaining are afraid or intimidated by these larger vehicles. Hey, get a clue, buy one yourself or quit your jabbering.

I will admit that it would be nice if they had lanes for tall vehicles, that way those of us in the small vechicles lanes could see whats happening on the road 10 cars ahead instead of the customary 10 feet ahead driving behind a truck, van, or SUV. Paying attention to what's going on well ahead of you is how you avoid accidents.

Best Regards

Sergio
9 posted on 01/29/2003 4:51:12 PM PST by Sergio (Logic: Not to be used by liberals, causes a server case of the vapors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson