Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
An individual human life begins at conception. That life, your life, or my life, is a continuum of individuality. That continuum originates as a single cell and, if things run as normal, will provide trillions of cells throughout a lifetime. Each 'benchmark' along the continuum of an individual life is an arbitrary assignment based on form and function but just as real a stage, or age of the individual human being begun at conception.

The other day, someone raised the twinning argument, to try and refute the truth that an individual's human life begins at conception. [Think about it: people work hard to try and refute the truth. Why do they do that? Guilt and/or an agenda founded in disbelief or willful rejection of the truth.] Since science is absolutely firm on the truth that an individual life begins at conception, only one of two possible answers must be the truth about twinning: 1) within the single cell at fecundation (conception) there must exist the genetic quantity of two or more individual beings, or 2) something is in the first single cell of twins that will split the genetic material soon to express the two individual beings, some anomoly that will act to 'split the road' that is both of them at the start.

The point to focus upon is both twins originated in the first single cell at fecundation (at conception). Every individual human being has its beginning as a single cell, the first age of its individual lifetime. If, within the first five days of fecundation, a second identical individual, or even a third individual presents and grows along the continuum of individual life, each of those individuals had their origin in the first single cell of fecundation. There is no other truthful conclusion possible. Within the first single cell at fecundation are all the individuals conceived in that conception.

Since it is a fact that an individual lifetime is a continuum that begins at fecundation, at conception, it is glaringly paradoxical to arbitrarily remove any age along that continuum in an effort to prove a later start to the continuum (kind of like saying you hold a single strand of rope, but then you cut the rope a foot from your left hand and assert that the after-cut rope is the exact same length rope you held before you cut a foot off of it AND pointing to the short tag of rope on the floor, assert that that piece of rope was never a part of the piece you were left holding AFTER you made the cut). If a person tells you that he or she originated at 18 weeks from conception, or originated when she or he took their first breath, or originated when his or her brain first had a thought, or originated when his or her heart muscle first contracted, or originated when her or his gonads first functioned, just remember, the lifetime of every individual human BEING begins at their unique conception/fecundation and to choose some other point to believe the continuum begins is absolutely arbitrarily illogical, not based in science or truth.

And yes, with first cell division, at least one HUMAN BEING is present on the continuum of at least one human lifetime.

24 posted on 01/30/2003 9:41:20 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: reformed_dem; madprof98; victim soul
BTTT
25 posted on 01/30/2003 11:08:12 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson