In other words, yeah they're producing weapons of mass destruction. Yeah, they're not following U. N. treaties they signed. Yeah they're evil. But hey! They SUCK at evil!
They're evil the way a nasty gerbil is evil. They're the kind of evil we have people throw cream pies at at state fairs. They're the sort of evil we give candy to at Halloween.
Ritter is parroting what the Islamist Press is saying Saddam's Butt-boy strikes again.
Yes, thats the end on the LEFT.
By Leon Barkho Associated Press Writer Thursday, Aug. 3, 2000; 7:51 p.m. EDT
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000803/aponline195140_000.htm
BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Iraq is not a threat to its neighbors, a former U.N. arms inspector said Thursday at the end of a six-day tour in which he did not visit suspected Iraqi weapons sites.
Scott Ritter said he had not asked to see such sites for the documentary film he is making on Iraq because he feared that Baghdad and Washington would use the visits for propaganda.
Ritter said the United States' policy toward Iraq is troubling. On the one hand, he said, Washington insists that Iraq abide by U.N. resolutions that require its disarmament, while on the other hand it links the lifting of U.N. sanctions to the removal of President Saddam Hussein.
Ritter resigned as a U.N. inspector two years ago, saying the United States was not aggressive enough in compelling Iraq to disarm.
But he said at a news conference Thursday that he quit because he felt the United States was manipulating the U.N. inspection agency for political ends.
The United States and Britain have been the strongest proponents of Iraqi disarmament, arguing that sanctions cannot be lifted until Baghdad proves it has eliminated long-range missiles and biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.
Ritter said Richard Butler, former chief of the disbanded U.N. inspection agency, UNSCOM, and United States and Britain had been spreading "inaccurate information, irresponsible speculation" to picture Iraq as a threat.
Ritter said his documentary will say that Iraq has "qualitatively" met U.N. demands and that sanctions should be lifted.
He interviewed senior Iraqi officials, but said he did not go to suspected arms sites because if he had found nothing Iraq would have said that proves compliance. The United States would have said Iraq emptied the sites ahead of time, he said.
Ritter said he borrowed money from an Iraqi-American to make the documentary, but was not sure whether anybody would buy it.
I suggest that Ritter take a long soak in such liquid, and then, a month or so later, come tell us about it.
Ummmm Chris ya think it's possible Saddam could have made a new batch???
"You are RADIOACTIVE!" (meaning your comments are worthless now, you PERVVVVVVVVVVVVVV!)
OK, Scott......let's talk about anthrax and chemical weapons, shall we?
You're clearly suggesting that all of their anthrax and chemical weapons are, in effect, useless as weapons. If that's the case and if what you say is true, then why the hell aren't the Iraqis saying so and showing this outdated, useless stuff to the inspectors? Why whould they hide something when you say they have nothing to hide?
If you are trying to disarm me and I open the revolver up to show you that there are no bullets inside, you're probably going to relax a bit. If I know that you'll shoot me unless I disarm and I know I have no bullets, wouldn't it behoove me to show you that I have no bullets with which to hurt you?
Ritter..........you're an idiot. Worse yet, you think the rest of us are, as well.