Skip to comments.
Canadian "inspectors" to seek deadly U.S. weapons
Reuters ^
| 30 Jan 2003 21:33
Posted on 01/30/2003 3:45:41 PM PST by demlosers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-186 next last
To: demlosers
Hey Libby! Psssssst! Over here! Here are some American WMD's down this pit over here. Yes, yes, I swear! They are right there! Well, you have to get pretty close to look...that's right....closer....closer...a little bit closer....if you look hard you can see them....*SHOVE*....oops! She slipped.
61
posted on
01/30/2003 5:11:50 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(U.S.: Masters of our domain...France: morally bankrupt member of "old Europe")
To: elbucko
Look up "hypocrisy" in the dictionary and you will see the Canadian Maple Leaf. When Britain was facing invasion by the Nazi's in 1940, the Canadians refused to allow British pilots to be sent to "Kanukistan" for training. They didn't want to violate Canada's "neutrality". Until '42, more British pilots were trained in Oklahoma and Texas than all of Canada. I don't have much of a liking for Canada, but they were in WWII on the British side long before we were. They've gone downhill since then....
62
posted on
01/30/2003 5:14:32 PM PST
by
Bismark
To: Flyer
Yes, we have weapons of mass destruction. We don't deny it. And we are not afraid to use them. Ask Japan.
63
posted on
01/30/2003 5:22:50 PM PST
by
Comus
To: elbucko
Look up "hypocrisy" in the dictionary and you will see the Canadian Maple Leaf. When Britain was facing invasion by the Nazi's in 1940, the Canadians refused to allow British pilots to be sent to "Kanukistan" for training. They didn't want to violate Canada's "neutrality". Until '42, more British pilots were trained in Oklahoma and Texas than all of CanadaWTF!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm sorry, this is PURE and UTTER B*#*&$#!.
Canada declared war on Germany on September 9th, 1939. So in no way, shape or form could Canada been concerned about its 'neutrality' in 1941 because by that point, it wasn't neutral.
Most of the British pilots of WWII were trained in Canada because of the difficulty of training pilots in Britain in between air raids.
And prior to Dec 7th, 1941, uniformed British pilots wouldn't have been caught dead training in American facilities as it would have violated America's neutrality.
If you want to complain about the NDP, that's fine by me. Naive doesn't even begin to describe them as far as I'm concerned.
But I will not, under any circumstances, allow to you get away with posting such crap as you've listed above.
My grandfather started fighting in WWII long before any of yours did, and I will not allow to smear either his memory or the honour of the the country he fought for.
64
posted on
01/30/2003 5:24:09 PM PST
by
altayann
Comment #65 Removed by Moderator
To: altayann
Just so you'll know, not all of us feel the need to bash all Canadians and Canadian-American relations just because you have some loonies in your government. After all, we have no room to talk when it comes to having loonies in our government.
66
posted on
01/30/2003 5:28:21 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(U.S.: Masters of our domain...France: morally bankrupt member of "old Europe")
To: altayann
Canada, England, Australia and New Zealand created the Commonwealth Trainning Plan in 1939 and trained over 100,000 aircrew in Canada by 1945. The original poster is full of crap.
67
posted on
01/30/2003 5:28:29 PM PST
by
Snowyman
To: elbucko
Uh... dude.... Canada entered WWII in 1939. Not sure where you got your information.
As for Libby, all the dumb cow needs to do is show up at any US border crossing. I'm sure by now she is on the INS blacklist and will be barred entry to the U.S. for life. (Yes, there really is such a list. Ask Canadian socialist author Farley Mowat who, in the 1980s, faced this rather awkward circumstance shortly after he threatend to go out in his backyard and take pot shots with his .22 at any U.S. military aircraft that might fly overhead. On his next visit to the U.S., he was stopped at the border and told to turnaround.)
To: Petronski
Yikes indeed!
69
posted on
01/30/2003 5:32:35 PM PST
by
Siobhan
(+ Kyrie eleison +)
To: albertabound
This woman is too stupid to slap!!
70
posted on
01/30/2003 5:36:51 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(all us Western Canuks belong South)
Comment #71 Removed by Moderator
To: Argus
Isn't it about time to tell Canada that we can no longer afford to include them in the North American Air Defense Command, Ok but before you do please pay your share of cleaning up the DEW line. You know, the line of radar stations built in our north that was and does give the US early warning. So far we got 300 million bucks worth of PCBs and worthless junk to clean up. Your turn.
72
posted on
01/30/2003 5:40:18 PM PST
by
Snowyman
To: demlosers
A left-leaning Canadian legislator, infuriated by what she calls Washington's hypocrisy over Iraq, said on Thursday she would lead a team of volunteer arms "inspectors" to the United States next month to seek out weapons of mass destruction. Uhh... doesn't she need a UN resolution first? That's what we had to do.
-PJ
To: Principled
Pinko Canucks: If you want deadly weapons come to my house
To: dennisw
The woman is obviously a segregationist. She also has litigation opportunities against the fast food industry.
To: demlosers
A left-leaning Canadian legislator,Left-leaning, my arse! A friggin' communist.
76
posted on
01/30/2003 5:46:20 PM PST
by
cinFLA
To: dennisw
77
posted on
01/30/2003 5:48:09 PM PST
by
moyden
To: Argus
Isn't it about time to tell Canada that we can no longer afford to include them in the North American Air Defense Command, and the next time some nutjob state like North Korea fires a nuke their way, they should call the UN to protect them? Most of the world sees these same types spouting off IN the US, also.
78
posted on
01/30/2003 5:48:24 PM PST
by
cinFLA
To: demlosers
I have an idea! Let's save her the trouble of coming all the way down here. Why don't we just send her one!
79
posted on
01/30/2003 5:52:52 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: demlosers
80
posted on
01/30/2003 6:01:54 PM PST
by
chance33_98
(Freedom is not Free)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-186 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson