To: kattracks; imhere
If it comes down to it, I'm for nuking Iraq if they use WMDs on our troops or anyone else.
Okay, it is easy to write this on a computer screen, but I've been on the receiving end of a bullet and I've smelt the bad breath of a man I just killed with my K-Bar, so I feel I have a small right to speak.
So, to hell with world opinion! If by using our nukes to save lives (both ours and theirs) in the long run was the right thing to do to end WW2, then I say do it to end the War on Terror.
5 posted on
01/30/2003 11:05:00 PM PST by
sonofatpatcher2
(If God Hadn't Wanted Fully Automatic Weapons, He Wouldn't Have Made All Those Armadillos!)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Agree wholeheartedly...thank you for your service to our great country.
P.S. Loved your homepage....
9 posted on
01/30/2003 11:13:02 PM PST by
garandgal
To: sonofatpatcher2
The old MAD doctrine is being replaced. Nuclear deterrence is maintained by the possibility that they could be used. Smaller tactical nukes will almost certainly be deployed in case Saddam uses WMDs. Personally I think the US should have asked Afghanistan for permission for an underground test of a thermonuclear device of say 5 kilotons at Tora Bora. With practically no collateral damage it would have been expediant, humane and cheap and it would have given our enemies a reason to think twice.
14 posted on
01/30/2003 11:37:55 PM PST by
ffusco
(sempre ragione)
To: sonofatpatcher2
If God Hadn't Wanted Fully Automatic Weapons, He Wouldn't Have Made All Those Armadillos!
ROFLMAO
DK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson