[balrog666]

When a dog poops in my yard, I don't "refute it". This article is no different than what a dog produces.

Looking to other people to provide you an education, especially when you give all appearances of being too lazy to do it yourself, is a very foolish plan for the rest of your life.

[PatrickHenry]

Refute this!

[Dataman]

This article is no different than what a dog produces.

Ok, then. The feedback from all of you gentlemen can be summed up like this:

Observation 1:You can't discredit the claims in the article. A couple of you were able to post links or quote a couple of bums found by the RR tracks but that's it. I didn't see anyone say that they couldn't refute it or that they didn't want to refute it.

Observation 2:It is perfectly acceptable to respond in a way that does not address the issue, yet makes the poster feel as if he had actually destroyed the arguments in the article. This phenom is similar to public school students feeling good about the F they just got on the test.

Observation 3:If a rock hound from the hills of Arkansas sides with you, that counts as a professional opinion. If that works for evolutionists, it works for creationists, right? Why of course it does! The scientific minds of the FR evos cannot tolerate double standards.

Observation 4: This one is the best. An argument is stupid because you say it is stupid. Never mind why. Your opinion is enough to stop the discussion. As scientific high-minded rationalists, you would certainly agree that any creationist can now waltz onto one of your posts, call it stupid, and end the debate.

I write this not to change any of your minds, minerology is not my forte. I'm not sure I want any of you evos to change your minds. You do such a good job of making your case that you very often work against yourselves. And the lurkers notice.

[gore3000]

When a dog poops in my yard, I don't "refute it".

You should know! You do enough pooping on these FR threads!