[-YYZ-]

If you can't see that this is a case of blatant circular reasoning that pretty much renders the rest of the arguement moot, there's something wrong with you:

"What then is the significance of these radiohalos, discovered in this first ever systematic search in these granitic rocks? The presence in them of so many dark, fully-formed U and Th radiohalos clearly implies that at least 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates must have occurred in these granitic rocks since they formed. However, these granitic rocks evidently formed only recently during the Flood year, so this implies that at least 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates must have occurred during the Flood year, when geologic processes were operating at catastrophic rates. Thus the rates of radioactive decay had to have been accelerated during the Flood year and therefore conventional radioisotopic dating of rocks, which assumes constant decay rates, is unreliable and conventional "ages" are grossly in error."

But of course I've come to expect nothing better from the young-earth creationist crowd. You have to distort reality pretty badly to be able to cling on to such a fairy-tale picture of the world.

[f.Christian]

yz...

But of course I've come to expect nothing better from the young-earth creationist crowd. You have to distort reality pretty badly to be able to cling on to such a fairy-tale picture of the world.


61 posted on 01/31/2003 3:59 PM PST by -YYZ-


fC...

But of course I've come to expect nothing better from the old // old -- earth evolutionist crowd. You have to distort // project your FANTASY pretty badly to be able to cling on to such a fairy-tale picture of the world ..
.. ..

and shove it down children -- people's throat too !


BTW ...

did you know the FR is the premier internet news // forum on the internet - - -

and you are broadcasting liberalism ? ? ?