Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfie
" Oakland's endorsement of his work as a medical marijuana supplier"

Anyone wonder why they did not go after an entrapment defense?
Seems if a government albeit a state and city say you can do something and then gov't thugs in black masks take you away for doing that same thing it is entrapment.
17 posted on 01/31/2003 10:42:17 AM PST by PaxMacian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PaxMacian
It goes a lot further than that. Ed was basically contracted by the City of Oakland to grow the stuff. I wonder why the Feds aren't charging the city with conspiracy to manufacture?
19 posted on 01/31/2003 10:47:16 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: PaxMacian
Anyone wonder why they did not go after an entrapment defense?

Uhhhhhh . . . I know! Because it doesn't apply?

I hope they nail "Ed." Nail him hard.

53 posted on 01/31/2003 2:53:50 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson