Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenpeace Blocks UK Ship Loading Army Equipment
Reuters | 2/01/03 | Jeremy Lovell

Posted on 02/01/2003 6:08:42 AM PST by kattracks

LONDON (Reuters) - Greenpeace activists protesting against the threat of an attack on Iraq moored their flagship across the bows of a British freighter loading military supplies for the Gulf on Saturday and vowed to stay put.

"We are currently having a peaceful blockade of the Dart 8 cargo vessel," Melanie Hill, spokeswoman for the environmental and anti-war group, told Reuters by telephone from the Rainbow Warrior in Marchwood military port in southern England.

"We are going to stay here for as long as we can. We are determined to stop this headlong rush into a war with Iraq that will only make the world a more dangerous place," she added.

She said the group had inflatable motorboats in the water around the freighter, watched by waterborne police who had so far kept their distance.

Dart 8 is loading equipment including helicopters, tanks and jeeps at Marchwood, the military section of Southampton port, to supply British troops who will join the thousands of U.S. soldiers already in the Gulf region.

The protest is Greenpeace's second action in the port in a week.

The Ministry of Defense failed on Friday to get an injunction stopping Greenpeace from blocking the port but did obtain a limited ruling preventing the activists from boarding or touching ships chartered to carry military supplies.

A ministry spokesman said Saturday's blockade was making it difficult but not impossible to load the ship. "They are creating difficulties but we have a range of contingency plans," he told Reuters. He declined to say when the Dart 8 was due to sail.

Prime Minister Tony Blair met President Bush at the White House on Friday for what many saw as a council of war. Both insist Iraq is hiding weapons of mass destruction from U.N. weapons inspectors and must disarm voluntarily or be disarmed by force. Iraq insists it has no such weapons.

Bush said time was running out for a peaceful end to the crisis, while Blair said on his way home that he believed the U.N. Security Council would pass a second resolution condemning Iraq if it continued to stall the inspectors.

Secretary of State Colin Powell is due to present to the Security Council on Wednesday what he says is compelling evidence that Iraq is concealing weapons programmes from the U.N. inspectors.

Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix, who said on Monday that Iraq was hampering investigations and listed a range of weapons still unaccounted for, is due to present a further report on his team's findings on February 14.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: targets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2003 6:08:42 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Let the Brits use the Greanpeace boat for target practice.
2 posted on 02/01/2003 6:09:36 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (_*_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

inflatable motor boats against a freighter?...... I think this can be resolved quickly.
3 posted on 02/01/2003 6:10:54 AM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Blow them out of the water.

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 02/01/2003 6:11:18 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Wasn't it the French who sunk the Rainbow Warrior back in the 80s, I think? I don't think these lame brains really want to screw around with the Brits. They are much more aggressive than the French.
5 posted on 02/01/2003 6:13:08 AM PST by Movemout (I'm not from Mississippi although I grew up along the river.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Enemy combatants. They should be treated accordingly.
6 posted on 02/01/2003 6:14:46 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Their website says one of their goals is to bring about: "An end to the nuclear threat and nuclear contamination." The U.S. and allies are simply trying to aid Greenpeace in that effort. Sheesh....a little help here...
7 posted on 02/01/2003 6:15:48 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Somebody needs to grab a porpoise, hold a gun to its head and threaten to "cap his ass" if the Greenpeace ship does not give way.
8 posted on 02/01/2003 6:16:42 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
Wasn't it the French who sunk the Rainbow Warrior back in the 80s

Yep. About the only thing courageous the French have done in half a century. Technically, this ship should be called Rainbow Warrior II, since Warrior I is now a reef.

9 posted on 02/01/2003 6:17:24 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Enemy combatants. They should be treated accordingly

I'm sure there's room for them at our country club in Cuba.

10 posted on 02/01/2003 6:18:35 AM PST by ASA Vet ("Hardcore wackjob segment" of FR member.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We are currently having a peaceful blockade of the Dart 8 cargo vessel,..."

And then:

She said the group had inflatable motorboats in the water around the freighter,

The solution to the problem is so screamingly obvious, it's almost painful.

11 posted on 02/01/2003 6:18:46 AM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Little floating green pieces.
12 posted on 02/01/2003 6:22:50 AM PST by justrepublican (Remind me to read and follow directions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Ministry of Defense failed on Friday to get an injunction stopping Greenpeace from blocking the port but did obtain a limited ruling preventing the activists from boarding or touching ships chartered to carry military supplies.

Whaaaat? A court would not agree that it's actually a bad thing to let civilians, most of whom are foreigners, blockade a port?

Shoot, it's even contrary to international law to blockade a port, unless one is at war with the nation the port is located in. Is the court saying that Greenpeace is at war with Britain?

13 posted on 02/01/2003 6:24:21 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
She said the group had inflatable motorboats in the water around the freighter

screaming obvious? Well, as a qualifed Helms/Planesman...the order "HARD right rudder" comes to mind! hehehehehe
14 posted on 02/01/2003 6:28:49 AM PST by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
Is the court saying that Greenpeace is at war with Britain?

Hmm, well they actually are at war with Britain, so they may legally blockade the port--and the British may legally shoot them, of course.

15 posted on 02/01/2003 6:52:18 AM PST by Smile-n-Win (make it Strike and Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Send them to North Korea until they can resolve that problem.
16 posted on 02/01/2003 6:55:51 AM PST by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Blow them out of the water.

I like your style. Only one thing I could add,

After blowing them out of the water...put them back in, then blow them out again.

THIS morning I am NOT in the mood!!

17 posted on 02/01/2003 6:56:57 AM PST by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lysie
Like your idea but may a suggest a slight modification? Do it off the great barrier reef of Australia. Hey even the Great-Whites have to eat.
18 posted on 02/01/2003 7:00:19 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Grab these SOBs and beat hell out of them!TERRORIST SYMPATHIZERS.
19 posted on 02/01/2003 7:03:49 AM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Hey even the Great-Whites have to eat.

Great idea. Kind of like biting the hand that feeds them.

20 posted on 02/01/2003 7:06:20 AM PST by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson