To: Movemout
the shuttle is an engineering marvel Of it WAS for it's time AND NASA has done a credible job of updating. BUT we have much better capabilities now, especially in heat dispersion materials, electronics and - as far as I'm concerned - overall design. I never did fancy the idea of a "flying brick".
That said I have to admit with the record NASA has with the STS, I wouldn't be afraid to jump on board.prisoner6
516 posted on
02/01/2003 7:09:53 AM PST by
prisoner6
( I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered! I am a FREE MAN!)
To: prisoner6
Looks as if based on the video she broke up early in the reentry process.
Resembled satellite decay reentry.
Wasn't normal reentry as viewed from Kennedy in previous missions.
J-track 3-D showing some satellites in low orbit in area.
It is a shame so many had become some used to shuttle launches it wasn't a big deal to watch any more, I think everyone will now appreciated the incredible amount of potential for disaster that exists for these complex activities.
To: prisoner6
I seem to recall that the x-15 had gotten to 80% of escape velocity and were awaiting a bigger engine when nasa closed down the program in favor of rockets.
629 posted on
02/01/2003 7:22:12 AM PST by
Valin
(Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson