To: weikel
Looks like there are some factional histories, Ill trust Gibbon until I see proof otherwise. Get any decent Byzantine history from Amazon - I recommend Vasiliev or Ostrogorsky. Gibbon was a splendid writer and managed to impress and hypnotise readers with his vision. But at his time people in England knew squat about late antiquity or Christian East. And he had a Deistic pro-Muslim agenda. Read solid history on the subject and you will have many proofs.
Gibbon is a great writer to be valued for his ideas, not because his work was true in factual sense but was true as a didactic phantasy.
34 posted on
02/01/2003 1:16:07 PM PST by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
Its true he was "biased" to say the least against the Eastern Empire. He wasn't pro Muslim I read his stuff on Mohammed and he basically said Mohammed was a power hungry whackjob who united the Arabs under a barbarous religion, and that Islam was only peaceful until Mohammed had an army behind him( then he started preaching a much more militant and intolerant religion). I'll check those guys out at some hypothetical point where I have the time.
35 posted on
02/01/2003 1:23:14 PM PST by
weikel
(Your commie has no regard for human life not even his own)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson