Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
If Chuck was interested in good genetics, he'd have never dumped Diana for that harridan, Camilla.

I dunno. Are good genetics exactly equivalent to physical appearance?

What if that absolutely drop-dead gorgeous blonde is a hemophiliac (i.e. quite likely to die in child-birth without major medical intervention)?

What if she's color-blind to boot (hint: your sons are guaranteed to be colorblind, and vulnerable driving in locales with eccentric/horizontal-positioning approaches to stoplight placement)?

What if she is... er... "blonde"? Is it better genetics to be beautiful than intelligent? Beautiful than resistant (to diseases)?

12 posted on 02/01/2003 9:32:09 PM PST by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Eala
"What if that absolutely drop-dead gorgeous blonde is a hemophiliac (i.e. quite likely to die in child-birth without major medical intervention)? "

And all this time I thought only males were hemophiliacs.

13 posted on 02/01/2003 9:34:05 PM PST by berkeleybeej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Eala
Living long enough to reproduce is apparently the only determinating factor.
16 posted on 02/01/2003 9:48:52 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Eala
What if she is... er... "blonde"?

Intelligence or lack thereof is not correlated to being naturally blonde but lack of intelligence is correlated to being a bleached blonde.


29 posted on 02/03/2003 8:02:53 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson