Posted on 02/02/2003 6:22:36 AM PST by madprof98
It is called rationalization - justify a totally untenable position.
There is a up to $500.00 (not to exceed ever $25,000) fine to any one that kills an 'endangered' fox, or upsets/touches certain turtle nest eggs along our shores. Under the detailed listings of the federal Endangered Species Act.
There is a $350.00 to $500.00 'amount due' to kill the human species. (AKA abortion) And in second/third human trimesters; scissors are jabbed into the HUMAN head and the brains are sucked out-In elective surgeries- daily, in the United States, all under the guise of a woman's "right." The only real "right" is the "right" to remain silent.
When will humans become "endangered" and protected?
When will the so called pro-"choicers" realize basic science skills of the food-chain? Human's are NOT at the bottom of the food-chain.
Do they really see what they do, with their political correctness all in the guise of a "woman's right"?
I totally agree.
IMO, she showed her true colors here, and let the curtain open to see the real agenda. When one claiming to be for a "compromise" attacks parental notification laws and partial birth abortion bans, I see them asking for a one sided compromise.
I have never seen any "opinion pole" that indicated anything different than that an overwhelming percentage of Americans favor parental notification and partial birth abortion bans. Those who are against either or both are the militant pro-choice types she talked about briefly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.