Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican versus Democrats?

Posted on 02/03/2003 7:06:12 PM PST by Craig1972

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: MonroeDNA
Hitting the sack now, but I will check in tomorrow to see if you have answered my two simple questions:

1. Do you believe in Original Intent?

2. Can you name even one Founder who would have agreed with your belief that the First Amendment covers pornography?

EV
81 posted on 02/03/2003 9:24:40 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"Your post above is a total twisting of my words, and I won't even make the attempt to separate my words from your strange additions to my words..."
-ev-

I made no additions to your words, nor did I 'twist' them. I responded to your posted comments, point by point.
Obviously, you cannot counter. - So be it.
82 posted on 02/03/2003 9:29:12 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Craig1972
Welcome to Free Republic. Here's an old Free Republic line, slightly off from what you were asking, though.

What's the difference between a Democrat and a Communist?

Communists know what they're doing.

83 posted on 02/03/2003 9:30:24 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Craig1972
The Democrat Party was usurped by the Socialists. They kept the same party name.
84 posted on 02/03/2003 9:38:02 PM PST by Consort (As Jimer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Obviously, you cannot counter. - So be it.

My words speak for themselves, without your strange interpretations.

The Founders had a clear idea of the difference between right and wrong. They set up a system of government that allowed that understanding to be worked out in the real world...a world folks like you aren't familiar with, it would seem.

Modern Libertarians are either unable or unwilling to understand what those great men meant when they used the word 'liberty'.

Thinking like yours has broadened the meaning of liberty to include license, and our country is worse for it.

85 posted on 02/03/2003 9:44:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"My words speak for themselves, without your strange interpretations."
-ev-



"Bilge"
-ev-
86 posted on 02/03/2003 9:48:01 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Had the Founding Fathers seen what we call pornography, they would have denounced it as a "mortal sin" and "blasphemous in the face of God!". IMHO
87 posted on 02/03/2003 9:48:34 PM PST by txradioguy (Doing my part to keep the country free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Your assertion that government has no right to decide what is evil and legislate against it remains, and will always remain, bilge.
88 posted on 02/03/2003 9:54:21 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
Indeed, you are correct.

If they saw the sewage that certain people are making merchandise of in our country today under the cover of the First Amendment that they wrote, there would be a revolution! ;-)
89 posted on 02/03/2003 9:57:11 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Whatever.


Get some rest, and someday, -- learn how to present an argument.
90 posted on 02/03/2003 9:57:37 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Whatever.

A juvenile non-answer, typical of those who have contempt for others and have nothing intelligable to argue.

Get some rest, and someday, -- learn how to present an argument.

I have presented my arguments here quite clearly, and you all have run away from the key questions.

You are no different from the Leftists. You twist the Constitution and history to suit your own agenda.

Why don't you just be honest and admit that you don't believe in the same form of government as the Founders of America did?

91 posted on 02/03/2003 10:07:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
EternalVigilance

Mr. Tpaine has issues he wants to grow up and be George of the jungle, and live in a lawless society.

92 posted on 02/03/2003 10:24:31 PM PST by Democrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Democrap
Watch out for that tree! ;-)
93 posted on 02/03/2003 10:25:55 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I have presented my arguments here quite clearly, and you all have run away from the key questions.

Your questions at #63 were answered at 77. Since then you have presented nothing but your unsupported opinion on what you imagine I've said.
Example:

You are no different from the Leftists. You twist the Constitution and history to suit your own agenda.

Total irrational bull, unsupported by anything I've written.

Why don't you just be honest and admit that you don't believe in the same form of government as the Founders of America did?

You are simply out of control. Get a grip on the reality of what I've been posting here at FR for over five years.

94 posted on 02/03/2003 10:36:56 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
For completeness, there's also a fourth party: the Green party seeks to destroy the First Amendment through things like "campaign finance reform" and also seeks to destroy the Second Amendment by means of ever more restrictions on gun owners.

You forgot the communist party. Which has many prominent members.

95 posted on 02/03/2003 10:39:53 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Democrap
Cute, -- but gutless.
96 posted on 02/03/2003 10:40:19 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
OH I foregot you're a tough guy George.


97 posted on 02/03/2003 11:02:04 PM PST by Democrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Th GOP leadership does not even know the origin of the elephant symbol. Posters for the Lincoln campaign in 1860 often had elephants, to show our party's unstoppable power. And some old history books do show Whig posters of a jackass-Andrew Jackon wearing a crown. The 1872 Nast cartoon merely popularized symbols which had already been around. It's in the book.
98 posted on 02/04/2003 1:37:46 AM PST by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
And you and your buddy continue to refuse to answer the simplest of questions.

All I want to know is if you believe in original intent.

Don't even talk to me anymore if you are just going to continue to evade the question.
99 posted on 02/04/2003 6:51:32 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
All I want to know is if you believe in original intent.

Obviously, you can't read. -- See #77 where I answered ~yes~.

Please, don't reply to me anymore if you are just going to continue to insist I am evading your inane questions.

100 posted on 02/04/2003 9:02:30 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson