Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Houmatt
Yep. In the same way bartenders are having to monitor and micromanage their customers.

Babysitting drunks should not be part of a bartender's job description, but there it is.

There is a bit of a difference here. The bartender is in direct contact with the customer and can see the customer's condition. This is akin to suing the liquor manufacturer or distributor.

10 posted on 02/04/2003 7:15:27 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Bob
There is a bit of a difference here.

Nonsense.

Read the passage in question again. Henigan is advocating the abdication of personal responsibility.

The last time that was done on a legislative basis was with bartenders. Now they have to babysit drunks or be held liable for actions that really have nothing to do with them.

12 posted on 02/04/2003 12:24:55 PM PST by Houmatt (The OTHER Axis of Evil: The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, the NEA, and the Rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson