Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonar5
What on earth is this rambling about. Can you give a succinct summary of your "theory", so we can understand what you are talking about? (and what has you single-engine license got to do with it?)
31 posted on 02/04/2003 1:40:19 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: expatpat
Old model tank used on this mission. Hadn't been used for a long time (more recent missions used newer, lighter model). NASA current press kit misidentifies this mission's tank as being the newer model. Sonar5's direct communication with someone at Michoud confirmed it was actually the older model.
33 posted on 02/04/2003 1:51:07 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: expatpat
He found the data that the tank was a old model with previous problems and connected the dots.

The only thing that I disagree with is the inference that NASA did not state which tank was used. Fortunately I heard them admit this during the initial briefing. The engineer stated that the older heavier tank was used. "One of two left in inventory", he said.

On the NASA site is the story of STS-87 and 86 which had insulation problems with this same tank in 1997.

34 posted on 02/04/2003 1:52:03 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson