Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ASOC
But if the old tank had problems associated with it other than greater weight, it wouldn't be a great idea to use it on any mission. It appears that this MAY be the case.
38 posted on 02/04/2003 1:57:57 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
They performed a number of mods on the tank and it was deemed safe and had not repeated the events of the past.

This tank unfortunately did. I cannot bring myself to be critical of the decision to use it.

In retrospect, sure! It was a bad idea, but who could have contemplated the accident and who could have made the decision to scrap this multi-million dollar hardware with no evidence except old historical records that have no relationship to the modified and repaired tank.

It is possible that time had caused the adhesive to fail and the shelf life of the tank was mis-interpreted.

Bear in mind that the insulation loss was really minimal compared to the initial difficulties. Bear in mind that this loose insulation had to act in a very peculiar way to cause the required damage, (assuming it is the cause) and that luck, fate and something else likely played a part in this.

40 posted on 02/04/2003 2:10:14 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson