Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jael
Did you catch the reply during the news conference this morning/afternoon about their installing more 'environmentally friendly' foam due to EPA regulations or some such?

Course, it'll be covered up and never make national news or anything.

3 posted on 02/04/2003 9:38:54 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes
Yes, I did notice that. They keep focusing on the tiles, but only a few are breaking the enviroment foam issue. (While still discussing the foam itself.)

NASA was probably pressured by the EPA to do it. (Just a guess.)

5 posted on 02/04/2003 9:43:03 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Black Agnes
The formula was changed around 1996/1997 to make it more "environmentally friendly." I'm sure that no consideration was given to manned space flight safety when this happened.

The fact that the spray on foam insulation (SOFI) formula was changed should be questioned, but it won't be. It's doubtful that you'll ever see anything about this on the evening news.

7 posted on 02/04/2003 9:47:44 PM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Black Agnes
Did you catch the reply during the news conference this morning/afternoon about their installing more 'environmentally friendly' foam due to EPA regulations or some such?

Man, if somebody is responsible for such a decision without properly testing the foam first, he better not cross my path, or else I just might kick his @$$!

26 posted on 02/05/2003 12:19:25 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (February 14, 2003, a.k.a. "Black Friday")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson