Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK TIMES: Cocked gun
The Times ^ | February 6, 2003 | The Times

Posted on 02/05/2003 3:09:54 PM PST by MadIvan

The US has powerfully reinforced the case against Iraq

Colin Powell’s 75-minute speech to the Security Council yesterday was a withering riposte to Iraq’s taunt that the US has no proof that it has hidden, and continues to hide, illicit weapons of enormous destructive power. This was, as the general had said it would be, a sober presentation, but the cumulative effect of his circumstantial, visual and auditory evidence powerfully reinforced the US and British contention that Iraq continues to deceive UN inspectors, to defy the UN Security Council, and to manufacture weapons so appalling that they are outlawed by UN conventions. Iraq claims that it has no more banned weapons, nothing to hide and nothing more to disclose. UN inspectors had already told the Security Council late last month of their frustration at Iraq’s enduring refusal to produce proof that it had destroyed weapons and precursors discovered before 1998. The intercepts General Powell produced added dramatic positive evidence that it has lied.

The Security Council listened to one officer in the Republican Guard ordering another to “remove the expression ‘nerve agents’ wherever it comes up in the wireless instructions”. These, as the US Secretary of State observed, are field commanders; they would not have been issued with such weapons if they were not expected to use them. The night before the UN inspectors returned to Iraq, the Council heard hurried instructions to “evacuate” a “modified vehicle” before they reached the plant where it was secreted. Satellite imaging, as General Powell acknowledged, is hard for non-experts to interpret; but the “before and after” shots he produced support American claims that Iraq has clandestinely stripped 30 sites of incriminating evidence, including chemical munitions and ballistic missiles.

This powerfully buttresses the legal case for declaring Iraq in breach of a series of binding Security Council resolutions, culminating in November’s “final chance” Resolution 1441. The case for giving the inspectors much more time looks threadbare; and with the exception of the German Government, which irresponsibly announced beforehand that nothing General Powell said would alter its contrary vote, the presentation could not but influence his immediate audience. Yet evidence sufficient to convict Iraq of the diplomatic equivalent of perjury has been in the public domain for years, not months.

General Powell’s second task was thus to persuade a global audience that Iraq poses so great and immediate a threat that it must at all costs be disarmed, even if that involves the risks and horror of war. His case for action rested on three pillars. The first is evidence that Baghdad’s nuclear programme remains live. The second is Iraq’s active effort to develop and extend the range of ballistic missiles, sprayer planes and unmanned aerial vehicles; these are able to deliver chemical and biological weapons that Iraq is known to have possessed in massive quantities in the 1990s.

America’s “conservative estimate” is that it has enough chemicals to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets; it also has stockpiles of biological weapons and new mobile production facilities. Such weapons, as General Powell said, are so toxic that amounts the size of his little finger could devastate an area the size of Manhattan.

The third part of his evidence was an unexpectedly detailed account of Iraq’s high-level contacts with Osama bin Laden, its provision of training to al-Qaeda agents seeking to manufacture biological and chemical weapons and, most recently, its collaboration with Abu Musab Zarqawi. Zarqawi, a Palestinian who ran a camp in Afghanistan specialising in poisons, is now based in Iraq; he is the al-Qaeda operative considered by European intelligence agencies to be behind the ricin plot in Britain and cells plotting toxin attacks in Italy, France, Spain and Russia. The bin Laden connection has been the weakest link; it looks less weak now. It is still not decisive; but as General Powell says, such a connection is dangerous in the extreme. In Iraq, the world is not up against a diminished threat lingering from the past, but confronting a dangerous serial offender, a dictator as contemptuous of human life as he is of international law. Containment has failed to prevent him building and hiding weapons that, he must be assumed to believe, would make him ultimately impossible to restrain. Even if it ultimately takes war, he must be stopped.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; blix; bush; iraq; powell; saddam; uk; un; us; wmd

"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar." - Winston Churchill, May 19, 1940

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 02/05/2003 3:09:54 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska; Cautor; GOP_Lady; prairiebreeze; veronica; SunnyUsa; Delmarksman; Sparta; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 02/05/2003 3:10:12 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
WHO has joined the ALLIES FOR LIBERTY & FREEDOM?

THESE ARE the 26 ALLIES for IRAQI people’s (women & children included) FREEDOM

U.S., Britian, Australia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Italy, Portugal, Turkey, Lithuania

Slovakia, Denmark, Czech Republic, Spain, Quatar, Jordan, Albania, Kuwait, Israel, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Macedonia, Croatia, and Japan

FREE the IRAQI people!!!

What OTHER countries want the IRAQI citizens FREEDOM?
UK AUSTRALIA
ROMANIA ISRAEL POLAND
SPAIN CZECH PORTUGAL
KUWAIT HUNGARY QATAR
ITALY ALBANIA JORDAN
DENMARK SLOVAKIA TURKEY
ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA
MACEDONIA SLOVENIA ALBANIA
CROATIA BULGARIA JAPAN
goodnesswins

3 posted on 02/05/2003 3:17:32 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Goodness, I'm a big fan of yours, but you've got that Albania flag posted twice. It's the same red background but on the second one, it looks like somebody goosed the bird. :)
4 posted on 02/05/2003 3:24:49 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xJones
EEEK....YOU are correct. And, NOW, I've corrected it...but I won't post them again right now. THANK YOU!
5 posted on 02/05/2003 3:28:46 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The third part of his evidence was an unexpectedly detailed account of Iraq’s high-level contacts with Osama bin Laden,..

There are those on the Left that will claim Powell did not connect the dots of Iraq to Al Qaeda. Unfortunately when these "dots" are connected enough, something, somewhere, in Europe or North America will explode and a lot of people will be dead.

6 posted on 02/05/2003 3:28:47 PM PST by elbucko (How much is the Eiffel Tower worth as scrap?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xJones; goodnesswins; MadIvan
I suggest a border=1 setting on your flags, too, for those with a white stripe.

The word of the day, Cauterize

7 posted on 02/05/2003 3:32:22 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("... yet we can pray that all are safely home [GWB]")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Thank you for the thread,Ivan.Bumping for a later read tonight.
8 posted on 02/05/2003 3:34:01 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"it looks like somebody goosed the bird"...

hahahaha!!! LOL...

9 posted on 02/05/2003 3:53:25 PM PST by alethia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Even the America-hating Lefties know that, duh, of course Iraq has biological and most likely trying to get nuclear weapons. The point is THEY DON'T CARE. They WANT Iraq to show its might and embarrass the US because these people don't care about America. In their eyes, Saddam is more moral than George W. Bush. They will never forget how much of a failure Clinton and Gore were, they are proud of their failures to do anything against terrorism during the 90's.
10 posted on 02/05/2003 4:01:38 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
PICKY, picky, picky....LOL....DONE! Thanks for the suggestion.
11 posted on 02/05/2003 4:03:14 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
In their eyes, Saddam is more moral than George W. Bush.

Close. It's not that they think Saddam is a better guy, it's that they hate Bush a lot and in their eyes America is powerful and rich and therefore, always wrong. It's sort of like those academics who believe it's impossible for black people to be racists-- it's not that they support black racism, it's that they think only whites can be racist because only whites have power.

12 posted on 02/05/2003 4:31:21 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Husband, McCool, Anderson, Chawla, Brown, Clark, Ramon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"Cocked" versus "smoking" gun.

Do the lefties know the implication of a "smoking" gun?
13 posted on 02/05/2003 5:24:02 PM PST by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Much to MY shame, Canada still does NOT have the quality of leadership to get on board. Oh God how I hate Liberals!! They are born stupid and die stupid.
14 posted on 02/05/2003 5:43:25 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (all us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
I hate Liberals!! They are born stupid and die stupid.

Unfortunately they are not content with that but insist on taking us with them.
15 posted on 02/05/2003 5:48:09 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Regarding your tag line. I have believed for some time now, that Canada will cease to exist as a single unified nation in the future. I think a loose confederation of provinces followed by outright indepenence for Western Canada is in the cards.

How the West puts up with Quebec even now, baffles me

16 posted on 02/05/2003 6:28:25 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I don't mind them being born stupid.

I certainly don't mind them dying stupid.

It all those years in between I can't stand.

17 posted on 02/05/2003 6:30:11 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool
18 posted on 02/05/2003 6:38:45 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins; MadIvan
Hey Tariq Aziz!....this might be a good time to wrap up your career as a pathological liar for SH and buy a condo in Tahiti. Otherwise you're not likely to survive the next two months. We're about to crush your brutal little regime, so my advice is get out of town.
19 posted on 02/06/2003 11:09:57 AM PST by carl in alaska (No me gustan los RATones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson