Skip to comments.
Michael Jackson descends
TownHall.com ^
| 2/07/03
| Brent Bozell
Posted on 02/06/2003 10:06:46 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Two freaks on tv on the same night, Jackson and clinton. How "lucky" can you get?
1
posted on
02/06/2003 10:06:46 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
The pedophile who thinks he is a little girl should be in jail not on T.V. (Jackson that is).
2
posted on
02/06/2003 10:42:52 PM PST
by
Be active
To: kattracks
I have carpel tunnel syndrome from changing between Jackson and Clinton. Who is the biggest LOSER? Inquiring minds would like to know.
RD
To: reagandemocrat
I was so engrossed in MJ's freak show and a Frontline about Child welfare I completely missed Clinton. Which is fine since he just annoys me anyway. (or her, whichever).
Gotta tell you though, that MJ thing was as wierd a show as I've ever seen on TV. Totally bizzarre. I kept wanting to laugh, but the guy is so pathetic I couldn't.
4
posted on
02/06/2003 11:12:03 PM PST
by
tjg
To: tjg
Believe me, they're all nuts.
To: kattracks
All he's telling us now is that Hollywood is a place where sanity goes to dieGreat line.
To: All
He's overdue for his "perp walk" sans veil and glove!
7
posted on
02/07/2003 4:48:03 AM PST
by
battlegearboat
(jail the lamma loving, hair burning, moon walking, glove wearing, monkey hugging, baby hanging, etc.)
To: kattracks
There's some poetic justice in Bubba being upstaged by Bubbles' boy.
To: kattracks
He seemed like such a nice, normal black teenager, once upon a time (cover of 1977 Jet magazine).
To: kattracks
I think the "lackluster" sales of 5,000,000 copies was due more to unimpressive songwriting and production than to a reputation as a freak-child. MJ's more recent music does not have the pop punch of his earlier material.
His reputation as a paedophile is based on speculation. Interesting to see how many on FR have climbed into bed with this Peter Pan wannabe and seen all the action with their own eyes. Unless one wishes to present himself as a witness to MJ's sexual proclivities in a court of law I believe it is wiser to give the benefit of the doubt and keep the mouth shut.
Self-annointed know-it-alls would be happy to run your life, too.
10
posted on
02/07/2003 6:32:07 AM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(It'll all come out in the wash.)
To: kattracks
I imagine that freak Phil Specter is sending the even freakier Michael Jackson a bouquet this morning for making him look comparitively normal last night.
11
posted on
02/07/2003 6:37:06 AM PST
by
hispanarepublicana
(successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
To: Fester Chugabrew
His reputation as a paedophile is based on speculation. NO! His reputation as a pedophile is based on the FACT that he paid a family of a child not to tell the world what perverse acts he did to said child.
12
posted on
02/07/2003 7:03:15 AM PST
by
sinclair
(Hey, I just come in here for nothin'... Hope I'm not wastin' anybody's time.)
To: sinclair
Ah America, what a country.
Where else could a poor black boy grow up to be a rich white women?
To: tractorman
Where else could a poor black boy grow up to be a rich white women? We were watching this with my wife's grandparents. That was a trip in itself, I think it was kind of a "car wreck fascination" on everyone's part.
Anyway, grandma is a bit forgetful, and she asked some very revealing questions.
Q:"Why is she wearing that?"
Q:"Why does that woman have whiskers?"
Q:"Why is she holding the baby like that?"
A:"That's a man, gramma"
Q, Follow up: "It is?"
14
posted on
02/07/2003 7:11:36 AM PST
by
MrB
To: MrB
LOL
Grandma Rocks!
To: Fester Chugabrew
His reputation as a paedophile is based on speculation.Wrong.
And leaving aside the fact that he sleeps with little boys in his bed and was shown holding hands with one of them--and it did not look like the normal interaction of parent with child, or caretaker with child, his treatment of his children is bizarre. The scene of him attempting to give a bottle to the one baby was sickening and frightening to behold.
You may care less about the welfare of the children left in his care, but anybody besides Michael Jackson would have been investigated and had his access to children prohibited long ago.
16
posted on
02/07/2003 7:25:55 AM PST
by
cyncooper
(God be with President Bush)
To: sinclair
"NO! His reputation as a pedophile is based on the FACT that he paid a family of a child not to tell the world what perverse acts he did to said child."Maybe he paid to keep snoopy noses out of his life. Do you know for sure? Were you in bed with Michael and the kiddies?
17
posted on
02/07/2003 7:36:49 AM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(It'll all come out in the wash.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
The use of the word MAYBE in your statement indicates that you are speculating. The use of the word FACT in my statement indicates I am not.
I am eagerly awaiting your interjection of facts into this discussion.
18
posted on
02/07/2003 8:02:17 AM PST
by
sinclair
(Hey, I just come in here for nothin'... Hope I'm not wastin' anybody's time.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
To: sinclair
"I am eagerly awaiting your interjection of facts into this discussion."Excuse me. You are the one who claims to know the facts. Shall we conclude you were there and saw it all? Did you file an affadavit in the case, too?
20
posted on
02/07/2003 8:35:26 AM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(It'll all come out in the wash.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson