Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Stark takes swipe at Bush over his past alcohol use
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 2/7/03 | Marc Sandalow

Posted on 02/08/2003 4:34:42 AM PST by Gothmog

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Washington -- Fremont Rep. Pete Stark, whose caustic comments directed at fellow House members have provoked anger in the past, took aim Thursday at President Bush's past problems with alcohol.

The comment came during a heated hearing of the House Ways and Means Committee as Democrats grew increasingly annoyed at Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson for not divulging more details about the administration's plan to provide prescription drugs to seniors through Medicare.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: negativeattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To paraphrase Reagan: 'Well, here they go again.' It seems like every month some Dem (Gore in Dec, Pelosi in Jan., now Stark) finds some excuse to bring up Bush's past history with alcohol.
1 posted on 02/08/2003 4:34:42 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
So is this guy Stark just senile or what?
2 posted on 02/08/2003 4:39:27 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
So is this guy Stark just senile or what?

No. He's pond scum.

3 posted on 02/08/2003 4:41:08 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
He is a DemocRAT!
4 posted on 02/08/2003 4:48:48 AM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
And he's safely been in office for almost 30 years. You won't see Democrats like Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) who are up for re-election in 2004 in Bush states taking pot-shots, but the safe liberal Dems will.
5 posted on 02/08/2003 4:50:45 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
...so instead of providing "ideas" and constructive comments, Stark, as most emptyheaded food trough whoppers, can only provide silly offensive personal attacks...

May it come back to him a hundredfold!

6 posted on 02/08/2003 4:51:18 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Don't blame Stark...blame the Kalifornians for their continued support of his reelections.

Stark IS what Kalifornia is!

7 posted on 02/08/2003 4:51:18 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Creative straw grasping!!
8 posted on 02/08/2003 4:52:32 AM PST by dktyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
and if you hear him talk you realize he must have only finished 2nd grade
9 posted on 02/08/2003 4:53:34 AM PST by The Wizard (Demonrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Did he mention the rapist clinton? Hmmmmm.Oh that's right, dems endorse those things when their people are in office. Clinton's name will always be associated with sexual harassment (which is OK as long as dems are the ones doing it), monica, waco, and NOW (who also likes sexual harassment and rape when it is against people they don't like).

Sick freaks.

10 posted on 02/08/2003 4:54:32 AM PST by chance33_98 (Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Typical mean spirited liberal.
11 posted on 02/08/2003 4:56:21 AM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog; All
"Stark attributed the proposal as "fanaticism to force (Bush's) right wing Christian religion on the rest of the country.""

We've all known that they believe / think this, but this a**hole actually comes right out and says it:

In the liberal Democrat mind, Christianity = right wing = fanaticism.

The lines are SO clearly drawn, folks.........

12 posted on 02/08/2003 4:56:30 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Fremont Rep. Pete Stark, whose caustic comments directed at fellow House members have provoked anger in the past

Sounds like he has a chronic case of foot in mouth disease.

13 posted on 02/08/2003 4:57:10 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Just for kicks I'll throw in the Pelosi and Gore attacks:

NBC Nightly News (1/6/03) reported on a Democrat news conference where House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said, “This is our jump start to the economy, as opposed to the President's plan of careening off the road recklessly, jeopardizing the long-term fiscal soundness for our country.” [Hint, the Bush DUI attack right before the 2000 election]

Excerpted - click for full article ^
Source: http://www.msnbc.com/news/854805.asp?0dm=C12ON

According to the Washington Post:

"Book-hawking ex-veep Al Gore, appearing yesterday with wife and co-author Tipper Gore on WAMU-FM's 'Diane Rehm Show,' evangelized for decreasing U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil and criticized President Bush's plan to permit drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. 'It's like an alcoholic saying, "I know where I can get my hands on another, ah -- "' Gore said before Rehm cut him off with a question, reports The Post's Barbara E. Martinez. Surely that wasn't a veiled reference to the president's checkered past with demon rum!" Lloyd Grove, the Washington Post 12/10/02 (Yes, this is an excerpt)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A32431-2002Dec9&notFound=true
14 posted on 02/08/2003 5:01:33 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Yeah, right, those right-wing Methodists!!! LOL!
15 posted on 02/08/2003 5:19:40 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
For clarity, I am not happy w/faith-based charity supported by tax monies.
16 posted on 02/08/2003 5:20:49 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
You mean he's a democrat.
17 posted on 02/08/2003 5:20:54 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (The one and only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
As far as I'm concerned, that attack makes Stark FREE GAME when it comes to digging up his entire past, looking for anything to smear him with.
18 posted on 02/08/2003 5:23:12 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
I'm not happy with any charity being supported by tax monies.
19 posted on 02/08/2003 5:23:52 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (The one and only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
He's an evil Dumocrat. But the interesting thing is that if a REPUBLICAN had said these things he would be referred to as a heartless, fiend that could care less about the addicted or unwed children. And most certainly a sexist pig.

But you notice none of that in the story, only a repeat of his past comments.

And who says the media isn't biased against Right.

20 posted on 02/08/2003 5:25:32 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson