To: Mark Felton
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota.
3 posted on
02/10/2003 3:22:12 PM PST by
jdege
To: jdege
I was thinking more like Brundi. I have always wondered how many of these life-time international bureaucrats would want to live and work in some G-d forsaken third world country. Living and working in The US is probably a dream come true for these jerks. Add in immunity, bloated pay checks, free transportation and the chance to feel self important and these clowns are in heaven.
6 posted on
02/10/2003 3:37:15 PM PST by
redangus
To: jdege
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota.Why North Dakota?
8 posted on
02/10/2003 3:39:56 PM PST by
Kaslin
To: jdege
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota. Don't be so cheap. The UN should have the best and plushiest headquarters that money can buy.......in Sweden!
To: jdege
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota. I'd prefer tents in North Korea. That is what you meant... right?
11 posted on
02/10/2003 3:44:32 PM PST by
TXnMA
((No Longer!!!))
To: jdege; Mark Felton
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota. I'm all for pulling OUT of the UN, including our funding.
17 posted on
02/10/2003 3:59:32 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: jdege
I'm all for a new UN HQ - if it's tents in North Dakota If you must put them on a praire somewhere, how about in tents somewhere on the Serengeti of Africa? Failing that, the steppes of the Ukraine. I'd say the Pampas of Argentina, but that's too close. Mongolia would also be an excellent choice.
21 posted on
02/10/2003 4:09:23 PM PST by
El Gato
To: jdege
Way too close to me. No thanks! Get them the hell out of the USA!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson