Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkeman1
No exit plan at all, no clear objective.

When war is thrust upon us, we cannot afford the luxury of insisting on a foolproof exit plan. We do have a clear objective, removing Saddam and his weapons of mass destruction as a threat to the USA. We can never seal our borders, and we cannot ever make America safe by defensive means alone. We must take the war to the enemy. Despite your skepticism there is ample evidence of Saddam's co-operation with Al Qaeda and many other terrorist groups. The Saudi government may give ideological support to terrorists, and some individual Saudis provide funding, but Saddam actively shelters trains and arms them. This is well documented to any who are willing to be conviced. As for whether you son will be based there 20 years from now, some parent could have asked in 1942 if his son would be based in Japan or Germany 20 years later. The answer might well be yes, but not in the way you mean it. I think Bush was quite clear when he said that any country that arms, supports or shelters terrorists will be treated as a terrorist. He also predicted some people would get tired and begin to question the need to wage the difficult, world wide war needed to prevail against them. Your post proves him correct.

52 posted on 02/11/2003 2:29:18 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
He also predicted some people would get tired and begin to question the need to wage the difficult, world wide war needed to prevail against them. Your post proves him correct.

Absolutely. I knew we could never keep the support for the WoT going strong for long...but I'm amazed at how quickly the worm turned. Truly.

54 posted on 02/11/2003 2:31:25 AM PST by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Hugin
Quite correct. To wage a "war against terrorism" in general is folly and unwinnable and I was tired of it when Clinton first announced it when he bombed Sudan the day Monica testified (yep- he declared a war against terrorism as well then). Just as the "war against drugs" and the "war against poverty" are proven unwinnable so will be the war against terrorism.

A war against a nation can be won. And we will win the war against Iraq. But against terrorism? No- we will only invite more with this war. I wonder who wants this war more? Bush or Al Queda?
58 posted on 02/11/2003 2:43:55 AM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson