Interesting you could call the info on the page as bad as the ChiCom propaganda when you couldn't read it.
Why didn't you answer me when I ask you what you meant then?
I am only pointing out that you downplayed the situation and harshly critcized accurate information.
And then today you talked about it, so I thought I'd point out your track record was not good.
If in the first place you'd been civil and answered me way back when, this could have been cleared up.
As it was it seemed as if you were slamming accurate info and my post -- which was accurate information very early on -- as bogus.
It was not appreciated on my part and was a disservice to others. <P