Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
I disagree. NASA is grasping for any cause they can to "prove" that the loss of Columbia was not their fault. Case in point: Challenger.

The official final report cited faulty booster rocket O-rings and the media dutifully reported it with no questions asked, which is a total joke. If you operate equipment outside of their design parameters, it isn't the fault of the equipment or the designer when it fails. The real cause of the Challenger accident was gross mismanagement. The NASA brass does not want that to be the cause of Columbia's loss, too. That's why they're trying to find a magic bullet to blame the accident on.

When NASA implies that meteor collisions and sprites are more likely causes than the big piece of insulation that was filmed hitting the wing that failed later, what does that tell you?

69 posted on 02/14/2003 11:08:57 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Case in point: Challenger.

Whatever you say Captain Queeg.

71 posted on 02/14/2003 1:47:17 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson