Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Denim' solar panels to clothe future buildings
New Scientist.com ^ | 12 February 03 | Jenny Hogan

Posted on 02/12/2003 4:13:40 PM PST by aculeus

Buildings of the future could be "clothed" in a flexible, power-generating material that looks like denim. The Canadian company developing the material says it can be draped over just about any shape - greatly expanding the number of places where solar power can be generated.

The inventors hope their power-generating material will enable architects to design complex, curvy buildings that can nevertheless carry solar cells. One day, consumer products such as personal stereos and cellphones might also harness "denim-power" to charge their batteries.

Unlike conventional solar cells, the new, cheap material has no rigid silicon base. Instead, it is made of thousands of inexpensive silicon beads sandwiched between two thin layers of aluminium foil and sealed on both sides with plastic. Each bead functions as a tiny solar cell, absorbing sunlight and converting it into electricity. The aluminium sheets give the material physical strength and act as electrical contacts.

The idea comes from Spheral Solar of Cambridge, Ontario, which acquired patents on the concept in 1997. Spokesman Milfred Hammerbacher expects the company to start making its flexible panels next year.

Recycling silicon

The manufacturing process uses waste silicon from the chip-making industry, which is melted down and shaped into spheres about one millimetre across. Next, the cores of the silicon spheres are doped with boron atoms, which turn it into a "p-type" (positive) semiconductor. Then phosphorus atoms are diffused into the outer layer of the beads, converting it into a negative "n-type" material.

Spare electrons in the n-type material flow into holes in the p-type - which establishes an electric field across the p-n junction. This field pulls apart the electron and hole produced when a photon of light is absorbed by the silicon. These charges then flow through an external circuit via the aluminium contacts, creating a current.

The arrays are simple to make. The spheres are dropped into a perforated aluminium sheet, which makes contact with the n-type material on the surface. Some of the exposed n-type surface is then etched away to reveal the p-type core, and a second aluminium sheet is applied - making electrical contact with the p-type core. Both surfaces are then sealed with a plastic sheet.

Bumpy surface

The bumpy surface presented by the spheres offers a large area for absorbing light, giving the material an overall efficiency of 11 per cent. This is comparable to the performance of conventional photovoltaic cells, and much better than proposed flexible designs based on conducting polymers.

Dan Davies, an engineer at Solar Century, a renewable energy company based in London, UK, says that Spheral's new material looks very similar to blue denim. Architects will like it much better than conventional solar panels, he says. "At the moment, solar panels are like the Model T Ford - there are few design options."

The flexible solar panels can follow the curves of modern buildings or roofs, and because they are much lighter than conventional panels they don't need specially reinforced structures to support them.

© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/12/2003 4:13:41 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Interesting. I've been a regular critic of silly proposals posted on FR for alternative power sources, but this might be really good IF it can be manufactured cost-effectively, with a useful life.
2 posted on 02/12/2003 4:29:35 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Don't worry. The Greens are busy trying to think up some reason to stop this method of generating energy.
3 posted on 02/12/2003 4:34:33 PM PST by Number_Cruncher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Let's make Rosie O'Donnell an outfit with this material. She would shut down the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.


4 posted on 02/12/2003 4:38:03 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
Let's make Rosie O'Donnell an outfit with this material. She would shut down the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

Bite your tongue.
Don't give that blimpo bimbo any ideas.

5 posted on 02/12/2003 5:00:19 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
Good idea! Patent it!
6 posted on 02/12/2003 5:05:15 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
11% efficiency, what's that, about 1 watt for every 20 sq. cm.?
7 posted on 02/12/2003 5:06:07 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
I'm not sure, but I think sunlight gives about 50w/sq.cm., so it would be higher than that (but my memory isn't so hot anymore, so I could be wrong).
8 posted on 02/12/2003 5:21:37 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Pinging.
9 posted on 02/12/2003 7:50:34 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
There is a Michigan company, Electric Conversion Devices (ECD), which has manufactured amorphous silicon solar panels for many years. They are actually extruded on a roll like Saran wrap. They are flexible, cheap, and rugged. One of my friends has tiled the deck of his boat with them.

It's not the same as the process in this article, with the spheres, but flexible, durable solar panels aren't new.

Also, I don't remember the efficiency of the ECD panels, but I think it was similar.

10 posted on 02/12/2003 9:07:31 PM PST by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
1Kw per Sq. Meter * sin(angle of incidence)
11 posted on 02/12/2003 9:10:30 PM PST by Elsie (Just why DON'T you trust in Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
1 KW/square meter is theoretical maximum - assuming no clouds, no atmospheric absorption, etc. (i.e. - parked in orbit).

Engineers use a "solar insolation index" for getting an approximate value that can be obtained. Desert areas in California and Arizona have a solar insoltaion of about 650 (vs. 1000 in a perfect condition) while Connecticut and Western Washington might have values around 300.

So in a desert area, assuming tracking that "follows" the sun - you could get an average of 650 watts per hour (daylight hours only) per square meter of array that follows the sun (or use the correction factor of sin(angle of incidence).)

Mike

12 posted on 02/12/2003 9:19:38 PM PST by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
The value I remember is 500mw/sqcm; from a book by Forrest E. Mims Jr., I believe.

Extra-atmosphere values are much higher due to the ozone layer, but that's another issue for another day.

13 posted on 02/13/2003 8:44:31 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
50 sticks in my head, but it could have been mW and not W, I'm embarrassed to say.
14 posted on 02/13/2003 9:32:17 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson