Skip to comments.N Korea threatens US targets
Posted on 02/13/2003 6:01:31 AM PST by conservativecorner
North Korea has warned that it has the ability to strike American targets anywhere in the world if provoked. Pyongyang was responding to the decision by the United Nations nuclear watchdog to refer it to the UN Security Council for breaching nuclear non-proliferation agreements.
Amid mounting tension Japan warned that it would "use military force as a self-defence measure" if North Korea started to "resort to arms against Japan".
Japanese Defence Minister Shigeru Ishiba added that such a defensive move would not amount to a pre-emptive strike.
Click here to see North Korea's missile strike range North Korea's latest threat comes a day after the head of the US Central Intelligence Agency, George Tenet, warned that Pyongyang had a long-range missile capable of reaching the west coast of America.
North Korea's comments are a typically bellicose response from the secretive communist state, says the BBC's correspondent in Seoul, Caroline Gluck.
A senior official in Pyongyang, Ri Kwang-hyok, told the AFP news agency: "In case there is a self-defensive measure, the attack can be taken to all military personnel and all military commands of the United States in the world".
He also called on the Security Council to investigate the United States' own nuclear programme.
"We insist that the responsibility of the US must be discussed too," he said.
North Korea has long been thought to have a missile under development capable of hitting the western United States.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) decision on Wednesday to refer North Korea to the UN Security Council brings the nuclear crisis to a new stage, our correspondent says.
CRISIS CHRONOLOGY 16 Oct: US announces that N Korea has acknowledged secret nuclear programme
14 Nov: US halts oil shipments to N Korea
22 Dec: N Korea removes monitoring devices at Yongbyon nuclear plant
31 Dec: UN nuclear inspectors forced to leave North Korea
10 Jan: N Korea pulls out of anti-nuclear treaty
28 Jan: President Bush urges the "oppressive" N Korean regime to give up its nuclear ambitions
12 Feb: IAEA refers issue to Security Council
Timeline of tensions
It raises the possibility of economic and political sanctions against Pyongyang - a move North Korea says it would regard as a declaration of war.
Under its charter, the IAEA must report any violations of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to the Security Council, and Pyongyang had been in "chronic non-compliance since 1993", IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said.
He said North Korea was only a "month or two" from producing "a significant amount of plutonium" that could be used to make nuclear weapons.
Despite issuing the referral, Mr ElBaradei insisted that the IAEA would continue to press for a peaceful solution to the crisis.
"All members made it clear it is not the time to jump to sanctions," Mr ElBaradei said.
'Window of opportunity'
Pyongyang's neighbours have reacted with concern to the new developments.
South Korea urged Pyongyang to seize the "window of opportunity" left open to it.
It also said it hoped the Security Council would "handle the issue in a way that prevents a worsening of the situation and facilitates a diplomatic resolution".
China, while backing the decision by the IAEA's 35-country board, warned the Security Council against getting involved.
"The UN Security Council's involvement at this stage might not necessarily contribute to the settlement of the issue," China's ambassador to the UN, Zhang Yan, said on Thursday.
"The only correct and effective approach... is through constructive dialogue and consultations on the basis of equality," he said.
Actual words, from Daschle's press conference, in 2001, on the National Missile Defense Program
Whether or not we want to violate the ABM treaty
especially with a concept [i.e., NMD program] that we may not know
that we do know now does not work
is something that also mystifies me.
Every aspect of the debate and the consideration
that is given this whole program
is... is troubling to me.
I... I mean... I...there's a disconnect there.
I mean...It just seems common sense....
I mean...there's no brain..
This isn't rocket science here...
Yes it IS rocket science....
that's the problem..
Hadn't thought about that..
As I just think out loud ....
as I meander through here.
(laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh)
That's the problem.
Daschle is 2% brains and 95% obstructionist.
(If that doesn't add up to 100%, it's because Daschle "isn't all there.")
At that conference, Daschle ended up looking like the idiot. (Could this be a case of karmic retribution? We could ask Sheryl Crow, I guess.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.