Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: genefromjersey
Futhermore, they can't even keep their stories straight. They have "explained" that what explosives they did find on the plane came from a "dog training exercise," a story with several significant holes in and of itself, even if it didn't flatly contradict the "zero evidence of explosives" story.
65 posted on 02/15/2003 8:41:58 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
That story clearly fails the smell test ; however,there was a terrorist who was doing "tests" on mini-bombs in aircraft at about the same time. In one of his little "experiments", a mini- bomb he planted under a passenger's seat blasted some hapless, picked-at-random passenger into mush, and forced the emergency landing of the plane. He was using nitroglycerine (!!!) in his shoe bomb sized charges, but could have switched to something more stable.

Source: THE CELL by Miller, Stone, and Mitchell

67 posted on 02/15/2003 9:25:29 AM PST by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson