[LogicWings]

Still on the same principle?! The same principle as the reverse engineering of nature that you claimed?!

I did not say it was reversed engineered, although I can see why you took it this way. Anymore than repeater stations are intention reproductions of synapses, but clearly imitate the principle.

Moreover, levers have nothing to do with either math, creationalism, or even evolution.

Your Assertion that Base 4 and Base 2 use in computer software created the analogy that I debunked. Takes tying together a few logic chains to see this though, not something I expect a creationist to be capable of.

You've gotten yourself off-topic.

The Topic is that creationism is irrational, illogical, and ultimately damaging to science. Demonstrating how your analogy was faulty was strictly on topic.

[Southack]

"Your Assertion that Base 4 and Base 2 use in computer software created the analogy that I debunked. Takes tying together a few logic chains to see this though, not something I expect a creationist to be capable of."

Debunked where, exactly? Certainly not yet on this thread...

[Southack]

"I did not say it was reversed engineered, although I can see why you took it this way. Anymore than repeater stations are intention reproductions of synapses, but clearly imitate the principle.

...

43 posted on 02/15/2003 7:20 PM CST by LogicWings

Really?!

"And that is because it is a fact that every machine invented by man is an imitation of a natural process taking place within man. Base Math 4 doesn't imitate our computers, our computer imitate the natural process. Got it backwards."

...

21 posted on 02/15/2003 6:55 PM CST by LogicWings