Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Daschle & Ides of March
Daily Herald ^ | 02/16/03 | Paul Greenberg

Posted on 02/16/2003 8:23:16 AM PST by dark_lord

It was a cold day in Arkansas. The forecast had rain and sleet on the way, and I was on my way to interview the Senate majority - oops, now minority - leader. Tom Daschle was in Little Rock to do his bit for fellow Democrat Blanche Lincoln, who was announcing her bid for re-election to the U.S. Senate.

I had hunted up the speech Daschle had given when he voted for the congressional resolution authorizing the war looming ahead. And I had noted his statements since showed less, well, resolve.

"We do know," he had said back in October, "that Iraq has weaponized thousands of gallons of anthrax and other deadly biological agents. We know that Iraq maintains stockpiles of some of the world's deadliest chemical weapons, including VX, sarin and mustard gas. We know that Iraq is developing deadlier ways to deliver these horrible weapons, including unmanned drones and long-range ballistic missiles. And we know that Saddam Hussein is committed to one day possessing nuclear weapons. If that should happen, instead of simply bullying the gulf region, he could dominate it. Instead of threatening only his neighbors, he would become a grave threat to U.S. security and to global security. The threat posed by Saddam Hussein may not be imminent. But it is real. It is growing. And it cannot be ignored."

That was last October - almost four months ago, and the danger hasn't lessened. So how come Daschle had been sniping away at the administration's position ever since? Just one example: "Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said, 'We have yet to see any evidence that Saddam still has weapons of mass destruction.'æ" - The Associated Press, Jan. 25.

Just where does he stand? I asked him. Oh, the senator assured me, he still believes Hussein is dangerous and shouldn't be allowed to get away with his game indefinitely. So how long is indefinitely? Oh, not more than a few weeks, he said. I checked the date on my watch. Until March 1? I asked. Yeah, he said. Glad we got all that cleared up, and even a date certain - which is the one thing you won't find in all those murky resolutions out of the United Nations. Hussein better beware the ides of March.

...

If I spot Tom Daschle sniping away at the administration's Iraq policy again, I will know he was just putting this country editor on. The trust will be dead.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailyherald.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: daschle; hussein; iraq
Interesting. Daschle commits himself in an interview with Paul Greenberg to a March 1st "game over" for Saddam Hussein.
1 posted on 02/16/2003 8:23:16 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
That title caught my attention!
2 posted on 02/16/2003 9:28:39 AM PST by Ides of March (Beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
Obviously, lil Tommy didn't know he was talking to Paul Greenburg, a national syndicated columnist.
3 posted on 02/16/2003 11:02:37 AM PST by fightinJAG (We will not tire. We will not falter. We will prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
"So how long is indefinitely? Oh, not more than a few weeks, he said. I checked the date on my watch. Until March 1? I asked. Yeah, he said. Glad we got all that cleared up,..."

No, Mr. Greenberg..........What you got a healthy dose of from the esteemed Senator Dashle is colloquially referred to as "a steaming pile of bulls**t".

4 posted on 02/16/2003 11:17:10 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
Do you think he slipped and revealed something he shouldn't have ...??
5 posted on 02/16/2003 11:19:43 AM PST by CyberAnt ( Yo! Syracuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
New moon MAR. 3, 2003, 2:35 UTC
6 posted on 02/16/2003 11:28:04 AM PST by reillyoburbank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
It won't matter. If you were to try to get Lil Tommy to repeat thoser words tomorrow, it would come out differently. And he would say the new words as if he meant them too.
7 posted on 02/16/2003 12:56:13 PM PST by Thebaddog (woof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Unfortunately, you're probably right - and the media would conveniently and quickly forget to remind him.
8 posted on 02/16/2003 1:05:48 PM PST by CyberAnt ( Yo! Syracuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
Tom who?
9 posted on 02/16/2003 6:59:54 PM PST by TigersEye (Let the liberals whine -- it's what they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson