[Taxman]

I have said it before, and I'll say it again: An on-board bomb (first shoe bomb?) or a surface to air missle brought TWA-800 down, not a spontaneous center fuel cell explosion.

There is just nowayinhell a fuel cell is going to explode without a primary incendiary event trigger.

I believe it was done by Muslim terrorists. I further believe that the Clintoon administration suppressed that evidence because had it become known that the Clintoon gang had no clue about what to do with terrorist activity in the US, they would have not won the election in Nov.

And winning re-election is all that miserable low-life sonofabitch cared about, that and sex.

[Anti-Bolshevik]

What you have just said is not a theory to anyone with an ounce of rationality, it's an axiom.

[tubebender]

I have said it before, and I'll say it again: An on-board bomb (first shoe bomb?) or a surface to air missle brought TWA-800 down, not a spontaneous center fuel cell explosion.

I agree on the shoe bomb. There was just enough residue on the seats to be detected. During the trial of Reid, the shoe bomber, the prosecution blew up a 747 with a shoe bomb. I also said after 9/11 that the downing of Egyptian Air was a test for the hijackers and the person at the controls was not a crew mmber.

[spyone]

Intersting...the first shoe bomb...some freeper here a month or two ago advised me that an Islamic terrorist group did, in fact, claim credit for TWA800. The press, or couse, ignored it, not wanting to lose a chance for an invitation to a state dinner at the CLINTON WHITE HOUSE.

[Alberta's Child]

There have been some extensive discussions on FR about TWA Flight 800, and after all of the evidence I've seen I concluded that the aircraft WAS shot down, but not by terrorists. The most likely culprit appears to be a U.S. Navy ship that was taking part in live-fire exercises off the coast of Long Island that night.