Skip to comments.
Testes gene may be what makes us human
News in Science ^
| Wednesday, 19 February 2003
| Bob Beale
Posted on 02/19/2003 12:21:30 PM PST by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Hum. Interesting.
1
posted on
02/19/2003 12:21:31 PM PST
by
vannrox
To: vannrox
So the next time somebody asks me "Are you nuts?", How should I answer?
2
posted on
02/19/2003 12:25:36 PM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
To: PatrickHenry
ping
3
posted on
02/19/2003 12:25:48 PM PST
by
stanz
To: vannrox
The sudden emergence of an unusual new gene expressed mainly in the testes Must be why mankind is referred to as Mankind.
4
posted on
02/19/2003 12:25:58 PM PST
by
templar
To: vannrox
33 million years ago. Its sudden emergence - and its association with the testes - may have meant that individuals who had the gene could not reproduce with those who did not. Hmmmmm. So if a gene mismatch is fatal, how would such a gene be passed on from the first person who had it?
5
posted on
02/19/2003 12:27:54 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: vannrox
bookmark bump
6
posted on
02/19/2003 12:29:06 PM PST
by
lepton
To: vannrox
I am confused. I thought that Homo Sapiens appeared about 50,000 to 100,000 years ago. I thought that "man" was traced back to "Lucy" about 6 million years ago -- and at that time we were small, primitive primates. This article is saying that the gene event occured in hominids about 20-30 million years ago.
Lucy, you got some 'splainin' to do.
To: vannrox
read later - All of our God-given DNA is what makes us human - it is He who gives life and breath to all.
To: templar
Think he's looking for grant money based on something "new" that can never be proved???
To: Sacajaweau
Professor Dan says "It took "ba***" to start the human race".
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Family jewels ping.
[This ping list is for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be added (or dropped), let me know via freepmail.]
11
posted on
02/19/2003 12:38:05 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas)
To: vannrox
Well, this settles it. There is no God or higher being. We just simply evolved.
12
posted on
02/19/2003 12:39:57 PM PST
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problem solved !)
To: Sacajaweau
Evolution (( overlords )) is -- full on -- brainwashing (( redacting // deleting -- HATING God -- conservatism )) and . . .
indoctrinating // programming LIBERALISM -- LOVING LEFTIST lies // bias -- all through America // society ! ! !
All unashamedly on the FR too ==== "fraud // corruption" ==== UNADULTERED tyranny // blasphemy -- slavery !
Aids of the soul // society === America !
13
posted on
02/19/2003 12:40:02 PM PST
by
f.Christian
(( + God *IS* Truth -- love * DELIVERANCE* *logic* -- *SANITY* Awakening + ))
To: vannrox
"The researchers suggest that this may have led to speciation among primates and, eventually, to the genetic differences that spawned humans. "
I MAY BE A MONKEY'S UNCLE!
Like every other article on this subject the writer uses; may have, could have, possibily have, and the top of all the politically correct evolution words "most likely" to have been caused.(Why can't they say they just don't know?)
Wake me up when they know what is going on.
14
posted on
02/19/2003 12:41:19 PM PST
by
BeAllYouCanBe
(Be All the government allows you to be!)
To: unixfox
Well, this settles it. There is no God or higher being. We just simply evolved. Wha???
Evolution is completely compatible with a belief in God. God created us; evolution is how He did it.
To: Lurking Libertarian
religious holiday for the god (little g) of Darwin worshippers. It would be sort of like Kwanza for "scientist".
278 posted on 02/14/2003 8:35 PM PST by Busywhiskers
Show // tell -- whacky liberal 'science' !
16
posted on
02/19/2003 12:45:10 PM PST
by
f.Christian
(( + God *IS* Truth -- love * DELIVERANCE* *logic* -- *SANITY* Awakening + ))
To: ClearCase_guy
This article is saying that the gene event occured in hominids about 20-30 million years ago. The article said hominoids, not hominids. The term "hominoid" comprises the apes as well as the hominids.
To: Lurking Libertarian
He's joking.
18
posted on
02/19/2003 12:55:39 PM PST
by
Dimensio
To: All
Everybody quit the bickering and LISTEN UP! Cup your ears and you'll hear the unmistakeable sounds of razor blades sliding across the wrists of the N.O.W.freaks....
19
posted on
02/19/2003 1:10:21 PM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
To: Sacajaweau
"Balls" said the Queen, "if I had them I'd be King."
"Nuts" said the Jack, "a lot of good they've done me."
20
posted on
02/19/2003 1:22:58 PM PST
by
ricpic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson