Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't worry, the government is in charge
Review Journal ^ | today | Vin Supremiwicz

Posted on 02/20/2003 8:27:22 AM PST by Rodney King

If some hustler sends me something through the mail that I didn't order, and then tries to collect the amount he billed me, do I have to pay?

Of course not.

If you throw something on my property without my permission and I decide to keep it, can I be charged with a crime for "looting" the stuff you threw on my property?

Of course not ... unless the careless litterer is -- you know -- the federal government.

The nation's editorial pages are full of self-righteous outrage, these days, at residents of Texas and Louisiana who are reputedly failing to "turn in" all the pieces of space junk that dropped on their property when the space shuttle Columbia broke up on re-entry earlier this month.

Why is it "looting" to keep something that was dropped on my property without my permission? The first instinct, I suppose, is to respond by whining that this is a crime investigation, and all citizens must cooperate.

But is it? A crime investigation? What's the likelihood anyone at NASA will be indicted for murder or negligent manslaughter? If there's any such likelihood, why isn't this investigation being handled by the homicide division of the Texas Rangers?

So that argument doesn't work.

Have the federals thought of offering to buy anything brought in to help them facilitate this so-called "investigation"? Of course not. Because the federal government -- just like Prince John claiming to own all the deer in Sherwood Forest, just like any feudal overlord -- figures it already owns all the private property in Texas and Louisiana, along with the wages and daily lives of all the people living there. The peasants are merely tolerated so long as they pay their rents and follow orders.

Oh, you callous brute!, the usual gang of suspects is shouting by now. People died! Don't you want to know why?!

I know why. They placed their lives in the caring, competent hands of a federal government agency determined to continue spending billions of dollars keeping itself afloat, even if it long ago ran out of anything more important to do than sending little kids' ant farms into space in the most expensive, cumbersome, useless aluminum buses ever built by the hand of man.

In point of fact, the residents of rural Texas and Louisiana currently being threatened with prosecution for "looting" the overpriced garbage that fell onto their property, already paid for that stuff. Was there a place to check off on our tax forms that said, "Send me back a couple of bucks; I don't want to keep funding NASA"?

I must have missed it.

• Meantime, the so-called "Department of Homeland Security" Monday warned that "families should consider designating a room where they will gather in the event of such an attack and have on hand duct tape and heavy plastic sheeting to seal it, as well as scissors, a manual can opener, blankets, flashlights, radios and spare batteries."

Then the DHS added, according to the rabidly anti-self-defense Washington Post, "Americans must take some responsibility for protecting themselves."

Does anyone notice a particular, common household tool not mentioned in the above list -- the one tool they're going to need if Americans finally wise up and do start "taking some personal responsibility for protecting themselves"?

Are Gov. Ridge and the other "ranking officials at the Department of Homeland Security" saying we ought to carry our guns and ammo with us into these "safe rooms"? And if so, are they calling on Congress to finally exercise its powers under the 14th and 2nd Amendments to overrule, cancel, abrogate and repeal every supposed state and local ordinance which "abridges the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" to "keep and bear arms" -- starting with the "gun control" laws of Los Angeles, Washington, and New York City?

Wow -- the federal government actually promising to overrule state laws in order to restore more of our freedoms? That would be a switch.

I decided to check it out. So Wednesday afternoon I called directory assistance for Washington, D.C., and asked for the number of the Department of Homeland Security.

The diligent gal on the other end of the line couldn't find it.

So I finally gave up and called the White House.

"We still have the old number for the Homeland Security Office," the nice lady said, "but I'm not sure if there's anyone still there."

As I write this, it's been 29 hours since I left my name and number and a brief summary of my question. No one has called back.

So my advice, should you see a North Korean missile speeding overhead -- or the five Arab guys who live next door wrapping belts full of Semtex or C-4 around their waists and then hopping the airport shuttle?

Use that heavy plastic to keep your ammo boxes dry. 'Cause you sure aren't gonna do much good calling Washington, D.C.

Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Review-Journal and author of the books "Send in the Waco Killers" and "The Ballad of Carl Drega."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guns; shuttle
Please don't shoot the messnger, I am just posting this. His comment about guns is right on.
1 posted on 02/20/2003 8:27:22 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Hee hee...I liked the whole post...
2 posted on 02/20/2003 8:34:13 AM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
While I agree that the government has been heavy-handed with respect to threatening to prosecute people for picking up the space shuttle wreckage that falls on their own property, I think it is a reasonable request that such shuttle debris be turned in to be used in the investigation. After the investigation, I would have no problem with the wreckage being returned, if the property owner was to file a claim on it.
3 posted on 02/20/2003 8:35:11 AM PST by SamAdams76 (California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Not to worry. Under the "homeland" insecurity law the gub't can declare anything a "critical infrastructure", thus. placing it or them under its control. You are aware, of course, that the internet and telecomunications are "critical infrastructures"?

"War" is such a great diversion to keep people un-aware of what laws are being passed, just like a magicians mis-direction.

FReegards
4 posted on 02/20/2003 8:40:46 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Why is it "looting" to keep something that was dropped on my property without my permission?

What if a car accident results on a vehicle ending up on your property. Are you allowed to loot it and take the deceased's wallets,or the golf clubs in the trunk? - tom

5 posted on 02/20/2003 8:50:31 AM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I actually like Suprynowicz. He actually has something interesting to say once in a while.
6 posted on 02/20/2003 9:01:49 AM PST by Sparta (Statism is a Mental Illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
It's articles like this that make many conservatives think liberatarians are a bunch of nutballs. Carried out farther Vin's idea of property rights would require anybody flying an aircraft to get written permission from each property owner whose land they fly over. After all, I can't extend my house over someone elses land, can I? Occasionally aircraft come down. It doesn't make them the property of whoever's land they end up on.
7 posted on 02/20/2003 9:03:16 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
Why is it "looting" to keep something that was dropped on my property without my permission?

What if a car accident results on a vehicle ending up on your property. Are you allowed to loot it and take the deceased's wallets,or the golf clubs in the trunk? - tom

Only if you get to them before the police, else, they're already gone.

Hank

8 posted on 02/20/2003 9:26:40 AM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
If you throw something on my property without my permission and I decide to keep it, can I be charged with a crime for "looting" the stuff you threw on my property?

False analogy. Littering implies abandonment. The feds didn't abandon Columbia, they lost it and want it returned.

9 posted on 02/20/2003 10:20:32 AM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson