Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Data Paints Surprisingly Poor Picture Of US Economy
Reuters/Forbes ^

Posted on 02/20/2003 11:37:37 AM PST by RCW2001

By Anna Willard

WASHINGTON, Feb 20 (Reuters) - Americans bought foreign goods in December rather than stimulating domestic output, wholesale inflation surged last month and manufacturing suffered in February, a surprisingly poor set of economic reports showed on Thursday.

Separate data revealed a labor market still stuck in the doldrums, with the number of Americans lining up to claim first-time unemployment benefits jumping in the latest week.

"Higher inflation, weaker growth numbers -- overall it was not a good combination for the economy," said Henry Willmore, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital in New York. "The claims numbers were disappointing as well."

Stock markets and the U.S. dollar weakened while Treasury bond prices rose after the release of the data.

The U.S. trade gap grew 10.6 percent to a record $44.2 billion in December as exports floundered and imports surged. The gap trounced expectations for a deficit of $38.8 billion.

"Welcome to the Grand Canyon of trade deficits. The sharp widening ... was surprising and somewhat discouraging," said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors. "While we continue to buy everything that can be moved from the rest of the world, our trading partners are not reciprocating."

The trade gap with Germany set a record and the gulf with Japan was the highest since October 2000. Imports from China, the largest U.S. import partner, surged to $125.2 billion.

MANUFACTURING SUFFERING

America's appetite for foreign goods, whetted by the relatively strong dollar, has left domestic manufacturers struggling even with the recent dip in the currency's value.

"There can be no question that U.S. manufacturing trade competitiveness continues to slip," said Jerry Jasinowski, president of the National Association of Manufacturers.

Manufacturing in the U.S. mid-Atlantic region slowed sharply in February, a survey out on Thursday showed. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia said its index of business conditions fell to 2.3 in February from 11.2 in January.

The reading was weaker than analysts' expectations of a dip to 10.3 although it still pointed to an expanding regional manufacturing sector. A reading above zero indicates growth.

Economists said the trade data mean the government may revise up fourth quarter gross domestic product by less than is now expected. According to preliminary data, the economy grew at a pace of 0.7 percent in the last quarter of 2002. Before the latest numbers, economists had expected that to be revised up next week to 1.1 percent.

"The trade number has implications for GDP," said Willmore. "It is still going to get revised up but much less."

INFLATION ON THE RISE

There was also worrying news on the inflation front. The Labor Department said producer prices soared 1.6 percent, the biggest leap since January 1990 and far higher than the 0.5 percent increase expected by economists.

Much of the rise was linked to rocketing costs for gasoline and heating oil as cold weather boosted demand and uncertainty over a possible war with Iraq pushed up prices.

Excluding volatile food and energy prices, though, inflation still rose an unexpectedly large 0.9 percent. Auto costs factored into that increase, after manufacturers cut back on incentives in January after a bumper sales month in December fueled by attractive pricing and financing offers.

But there were price rises outside the autos and energy sectors, including in pharmaceuticals and capital equipment.

The report may come as a surprise to Federal Reserve officials. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said last week there is little sign of inflation in the economy.

However, some economists played down the data, saying not too much should be made of one month's numbers and pointing out that the report may actually soothe fears about deflation.

"I told our folks on the trading floor not to blow a gasket on the PPI number," said Mark Vitner, senior economist at Wachovia Securities.

For a more complete picture of inflation, financial markets will look to Friday's report on consumer prices. Analysts see the Consumer Price Index to rise by 0.3 percent overall or 0.2 percent without food and energy.

In disappointing news from the job front, the Labor Department said initial claims for unemployment aid rose 21,000 to a seasonally adjusted 402,000 in the week ended Feb. 15.

The number was worse than the 382,000 expected by economists, many of whom view claims above the 400,000 level as a sign of a deteriorating jobs market.

"The weakness in the economy is reflected in the jobless claims numbers which show we have still very little traction in employment growth and unlikely to see any in the near future," said Tim O'Neill, chief economist of the BMO Financial Group.

New record lows for 30- and 15-year mortgage rates released on Thursday offered one small bright spot for the economy. Low rates have helped housing and, through heavy mortgage refinancing, consumer spending remain engines of economic growth with businesses still extremely cautious.

Copyright 2003, Reuters News Service


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/20/2003 11:37:37 AM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Nice to have a GOP controlled House, Senate, and White House.
2 posted on 02/20/2003 11:39:05 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Hmmm. Must have missed all those reports from yesterday---housing starts up, mfg. up, income up.

Reuters has a wonderful way of presenting the Dem talking points. Oh, and by the way, right now we need inflation. We have been in DEFLATION for six years (thanks to Clinton's stupid economic policies, which forced Greenspan to choke off all money growth). Inflation in this context is a GOOD thing.

3 posted on 02/20/2003 12:08:33 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Democratic party propaganda?
4 posted on 02/20/2003 12:11:20 PM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
The trade gap with Germany set a record and the gulf with Japan was the highest since October 2000. Imports from China, the largest U.S. import partner, surged to $125.2 billion.

Can anyone tell me when the U.S. "Trade Gap" has ever been positive?

Great wealth created, means there's great wealth to spend -- continuously -- month after month after month after ....

5 posted on 02/20/2003 12:15:50 PM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS
Unfortunately, reality is meeting optimism:


6 posted on 02/20/2003 12:59:21 PM PST by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
The "trade gap" is rather meaningless overall. We send them dollars, they send us goods. Some things are not counted for political reasons so things never balance out. There's also three-way trade which makes things even more difficult to analyze.

I tend to think a big trade gap is good in the the US economy is creating enough money to buy a lot. On the other hand, if the gap is due to oil imports, that's not as good as it means the price of oil went up.
7 posted on 02/20/2003 1:04:12 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"The trade gap with Germany set a record"

Based upon the number of people I've heard talking about boycotting German goods, this won't last unless Germany changes their position on Iraq.

8 posted on 02/20/2003 1:24:59 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
The DOW is only tangentially related to the economy---or did you miss the 1990s when the DOW was surging, but everyone here was claiming the economy sucked?
9 posted on 02/20/2003 1:55:30 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
By the way, on both the DOW and the economy, they are 100% related, IMHO, to the Iraq situation, which is in turn related to the "War on Terror." Markets and consumers and suppliers are edgy about how all this will shake out.

I have great confidence that once Bagdhad is occupied, we will see a significant turnaround. It has taken FAR longer than I predicted (I'm wrong in that regard), because I thought we would already have turned Iraq into a giant used-car lot by now. But the economy is dependent on "animal spirits" that are driven by national security issues right now.

10 posted on 02/20/2003 1:59:47 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LS
The economy was pretty good to me in the 90s. It's still pretty good for me in the oughts too (but I've lost about 12% in my portfolio). Either way it evens out.
11 posted on 02/20/2003 5:31:03 PM PST by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Well, mine is down about 30%, but despite that I've increased my asset base by about 25% and lowered my total debt. So, as you say, it must be working out. (all this without any substantial outside writing contracts that I saw in the 1990s!)
12 posted on 02/21/2003 4:38:22 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson