Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The huge deficit time bomb-CBS
CBS Marketwatch ^

Posted on 02/23/2003 12:59:59 AM PST by BlackJack

PALM BEACH GARDENS, Fla. (WeissRatings) -- The President recently submitted his budget with a $304 billion deficit for 2003, sending shock waves through the corridors of the Capitol, leaving investors stunned, and setting off a new whirlwind of venomous, partisan debate.

I'm non-partisan. Much as I have no business relationship with the thousands of companies I rate, I have no commitment to either side of the aisle. I look strictly at the numbers and tell it like it is:

The federal budget is a great time bomb that could soon explode. Both parties are responsible; both must suffer the consequences.

Right now, the Administration pooh-poohs growing deficit concerns with the argument that it's still a relatively small fraction of GDP.

Problem: The deficit is potentially much larger than virtually anyone cares to admit. Consider these shocking facts:

Deficit shocker #1

The $304 billion excludes the deficits of agencies that are guaranteed, backed or sponsored by the U.S. government. If you include these, you'll find that the real federal deficit is now over $800 billion, even before adding the cost of the Iraq war and any other new outlays.

Want proof? Check Table F.4 of the Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds, which shows that the government raised new money at an average annual rate of $810 billion for deficit financing in the first three quarters of 2002. The third line of the Fed's table, "U.S. Government securities," even shows the government was borrowing at the annual rate of over $1 trillion in the second quarter of last year.

Deficit shocker #2

The $304 billion deficit Mr. Bush has proposed does not include one dime for the upcoming war in Iraq, which will cost anywhere from $50 billion to $200 billion, according to government and private estimates.

Deficit shocker #3

The Bush budget includes nothing to account for proposed tax changes that are expected to cost $500 billion over the next 10 years.

Deficit shocker #4

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) announced in late January that its $7 billion surplus of year-end 2001 has now turned into a $3.6 billion deficit at year-end 2002 -- a staggering loss of $10.6 billion in 12 months. In addition, the Director of the PBGC estimates that the pension funds it insures are under funded to the tune of about $300 billion. That implies a new infusion of federal funds into the PBGC and more red ink in the federal budget.

Deficit shocker #5

If earnings decline ... or the economy sinks back into recession (even a mild one) ... or if there is a financial disaster of any kind ... the budget numbers will be still worse.

Reason: Tax revenues flowing into the Treasury's coffers will fall almost immediately ... and cash outflows for unemployment benefits and other payments will surge.

Impact on investors

Even if the deficit's size can be contained somehow, its impacts are unmistakable.

First, any company or municipality seeking to raise capital now faces stiffening competition from Uncle Sam. Already, IPO and venture capital is drying up. Total capital invested in entrepreneurial companies fell 26 percent in the third quarter of last year to $4.5 billion.

As a result, thousands of credit-addicted companies are facing cold-turkey withdrawal. As the federal deficit grows, this situation can only worsen.

Second, long-term bond yields are bound rise, especially in inflation-adjusted terms. Reason: Huge new supplies dumped on the market depress or hold down the price.

Third, corporate earnings are likely to take another hit.

Ballooning deficits can pull scarce funds away from private companies. They can force more cutbacks in equipment spending. They can prompt companies to reduce inventories. And they can gum up the works of the entire economy.

End result: Lower stock prices.

Where to run

My advice: Get out of the stock market and to a safe haven, such as a money fund that invest exclusively U.S. Treasury securities, such American Century Capital Preservation Fund, Dreyfus 100% US Treasury Fund, Fidelity Spartan US Treasury Fund, or U.S. Treasury Security Cash Fund. Like all money markets, the yield is very low right now. But you will sleep nights.

Next, for stocks you cannot sell, seriously consider a hedge such as the Rydex Ursa Fund (RYURX: news, chart, profile). This fund is designed to rise about 10 percent for every 10 percent decline in the S&P 500 Index ($SPX: news, chart, profile). Naturally, if the market goes up instead, you can lose money with this fund. But I think the bear market is far from over.

Last, if you are concerned about rising interest rates in the wake of giant federal deficits, another hedge worth considering is the Rydex Juno Fund (RYJUX: news, chart, profile), which is designed to profit from higher Treasury rates.

Above all: Keep your money safe.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: cbs; mediabias; seebs; viacom; viacommie
Dollar in for a bumpy ride.
1 posted on 02/23/2003 12:59:59 AM PST by BlackJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
The Bush budget includes nothing to account for proposed tax changes that are expected to cost $500 billion over the next 10 years.

There's the give-away - - only a liberal Democrat would consider tax cuts a "cost". When anybody from CBS says "I'm non-partisan", wrinkle your brow, get a wry smirk on your face, and dive in at your own risk. And be very skeptical.

2 posted on 02/23/2003 1:09:18 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Ditto - When will the alphabet networks honestly report that reductions in taxes stimulated the economy under Reagan (and Kennedy...and PUTIN), leading to significant economic expansion and vastly increased tax revenues. Why is it that the Demoncrats can't seem to put aside a dime for a rainy day, like the rest of us. It would also be interesting if someone were to compare the underlying assumption changes between the various scenarios that are being used for all the scaremongering. You don't think that the impeached former POTUS inflated the estimate of the surplus achieved under his administration on the way out, do you?
3 posted on 02/23/2003 1:15:32 AM PST by SaudiDuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
Oh so now deficits are the road to perdition...where were these guys for the last thirty years? CBS indeed.
4 posted on 02/23/2003 1:20:09 AM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
And if there's such a stiff competition for investment capital why am I getting such sh#tty rates of return?
If this were true interest on bonds would be skyrocketing.
5 posted on 02/23/2003 3:57:11 AM PST by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
There are several way to answer this traitor's blabber:

- Blame it all on Clinton
- Note that there is 'a decrease in the rate of increase...'
- A trillion here, a trillion there... who's counting any longer?
- Note that this is small 'as a percentage of something else'
- Note that we also have a half-trillion trade deficit this year.
- SO WHAT????
6 posted on 02/23/2003 5:20:28 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
I forgot...

- Talk a lot about economic stimulation/excitation
- Note that Saddam would be a lot worse off at the end of the day
7 posted on 02/23/2003 5:21:34 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
I used to deplore big deficits, but I've come to realize that a deficit is the ONLY obstacle to government growing at astronomical rates instead of just ridiculous rates.

When deficits are small or non-existent, both parties act like kids who have a few coins jingling in their pockets and can't wait to spend them.
8 posted on 02/23/2003 5:41:57 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
This is a great time to put the brakes on spending in Washington. The waste from that place could retire the debt very quickly and it is a very good time to stop all hiring of federal employees, the Bureaucrats out number civilians now. This is not the government of the Founding Fathers, whose primary responsibility was protecting the lives, liberty and property of the citizens, it is an expansionist government that wastes billions of our tax dollars each and every day. The “time bomb” could be stopped right now with proper fiscal responsibility. The socialists are pushing for and promising voters entitlements in health care, childcare, welfare of all sorts. Americans, it does not work and we as a country can’t afford such laziness.

Now is the time to put all politicians on notice that we won’t pay for their stupidity and their largess with our money! The economy doesn’t depend on Special Interests and the Democratic Socialists are abandoning our Constitution to achieve these ends.

9 posted on 02/23/2003 6:28:17 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
"When deficits are small or non-existent, both parties act like kids who have a few coins jingling in their pockets and can't wait to spend them."

Right. And to further the analogy (if I may), those coins jungling in their pockets came from bullying another kid to once again hand over his lunch money...

10 posted on 02/23/2003 6:47:09 AM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm


A bit of history on the Fed. Reserve.......

A very long read, but well worth it.
11 posted on 02/23/2003 7:19:10 AM PST by timesarechangin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulie
SO TRUE..8)
12 posted on 02/23/2003 8:18:37 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just be because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
If the government doesn't want to cut spending, I guess they can just start printing a whole lot more dollars.
13 posted on 02/23/2003 8:39:03 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
Yep, the dollar IS in for a rough ride. They are going to pay for all of this with the hidden tax of inflation. The government will print more dollars to pay their own debts, which will collapse the value of the dollars that we earn and hold. If you don't get an 8% a year raise, you are losing buying power, because they are printing extra dollars to pay their bills just that fast. It is a hidden tax because they don't have the guts to raise taxes openly.

That means that the article's advice is DEAD WRONG. Stay out of US treasuries. They have a fixed return in dollars, whose value is being deliberately undermined. Stocks may SEEM to stay level, but only because they are measured in dollars whose value is shrinking. I do not know where to put ones money. Real assets I suppose.
14 posted on 02/23/2003 11:31:25 AM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
It will increase the deficit, the situation we are in right now
seems to be a problem of working off debt from the go-go 90's.
So far, tax cuts haven't done the job of stimulating growth.
Neither has lowering interest rates. We have to work through
over capacity and huge debt loads perhaps. Its a strange economic time.

15 posted on 02/23/2003 11:51:46 AM PST by BlackJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack
Buy gold! ;o)
16 posted on 02/23/2003 11:57:14 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson