Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Creationists Backed Into a Corner?
AgapePress ^ | February 24, 2003 | Jim Brown

Posted on 02/24/2003 1:25:18 PM PST by Remedy

More than 200 evolutionists have issued a statement aimed at discrediting advocates of intelligent design and belittling school board resolutions that question the validity of Darwinism.

The National Center for Science Education has issued a statement that backs evolution instruction in public schools and pokes fun at those who favor teaching the controversy surrounding Darwinian evolution. According to the statement, "it is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible" for creation science to be introduced into public school science textbooks. [See Earlier Article]

Forrest Turpen, executive director of Christian Educators Association International, says it is obvious the evolution-only advocates feel their ideology and livelihood are being threatened.

"There is a tremendous grouping of individuals whose life and whose thought patterns are based on only an evolutionary point of view," Turpen says, "so to allow criticism of that would be to criticize who they are and what they're about. That's one of the issues."

Turpen says the evolution-only advocates also feel their base of financial rewards is being threatened.

"There's a financial issue here, too," he says. "When you have that kind of an establishment based on those kinds of thought patterns, to show that there may be some scientific evidence -- and there is -- that would refute that, undermines their ability to control the science education and the financial end of it."

Turpen says although evolutionists claim they support a diversity of viewpoints in the classroom, they are quick to stifle any criticism of Darwinism. In Ohio recently, the State Board of Education voted to allow criticism of Darwinism in its tenth-grade science classes.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 741-756 next last
To: Ichneumon
If so, then it's clear that they don't understand the meaning of the words "science", "theory", or "fact", and have no place trying to impose their ideas about them onto science classrooms.

It is an argument in semantics to be sure, but at the same time science cannot "prove" evolution anymore than it can "prove" any aspect of science.

41 posted on 02/24/2003 2:22:02 PM PST by realpatriot71 (legalize freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke; Dataman
show me where religion does that, and i'll have my shoes for dessert.

37 posted on 02/24/2003 5:18 PM EST by whattajoke

You just put both feet firmly in your mouth.

With An Apology to Arius: When and How Should We Deal with Heresies and Heretics?

42 posted on 02/24/2003 2:22:51 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
"That would be better than an artistic rendition of rock to man."

Yes, right. Now, who teaches that humans came from rocks? That's a new theory on me. Oh wait....it's in Genesis...now I remember. Goddidit.
43 posted on 02/24/2003 2:23:02 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Star gazing in box (( pinholes // evolution )) --- you !
44 posted on 02/24/2003 2:23:41 PM PST by f.Christian (( + God *IS* Truth + love *courage*// LIBERTY *logic* *SANITY*Awakening + ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Will this propsed disclaimer apply to all scientific theories, or just evolution?

As far as I know, just evolution.

45 posted on 02/24/2003 2:23:55 PM PST by realpatriot71 (legalize freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
on these threads, there are enough folks who believe what you wrote that it's tough to decipher sometimes.
46 posted on 02/24/2003 2:24:22 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: USMA83
I hardly ever post on these threads anymore. The arrogance of the evolutionists on FR and elsewhere is simply breathtaking. Nobody but they can be scientific in their self-centered eyes.
47 posted on 02/24/2003 2:25:17 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Chapter 7 Thermodynamics of Living Systems, p113

Chapter 8 Thermodynamics and the Origin of life, p127

Chapter 9 Specifying How Work is to be Done, p144
48 posted on 02/24/2003 2:26:38 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
It would be just about what I had in a private Christian school in the 70's, i.e. full, complete instruction on where the SCIENCE is, including evolution as well as science that supports a Creationist point of view. Either viewpoint requires faith. Darwinism is not reproducible science. Darwin may claim to be consistent with Scientific fact, but it is not based on reproducible Science. Creationists can make the same claim.

My college science classes required an evolutionary viewpoint to attain a passing grade, period. You couldn't introduce other faith-based view points, based on science, if they differed from Darwinist dogma. You couldn't ask a question that pre-supposed a Creationist world view.

No Creationist wants to eliminate free and open discourse. No Creationist wants to prevent introduction of Scientific evidence on the origins of the Universe and man, even if they disagree with the theories offered with that evidence. We'd just like to have the same "1st Ammendment" rights that the rest of the Scientific world has. However, Darwinists can't tolerate dissent, because much of their "science" rests upon a foundation of half-truths, misinterpretations, and lies.

49 posted on 02/24/2003 2:27:20 PM PST by Steel and Fire and Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
Evolution is like a tropical flower in Churchill MB. Even if you protect it from the elements it will soon die.

Yawn. Luddites have been predicting the imminent demise of evolution for 150 years now. "Yup, it'll happen Real Soon Now", they keep assuring us.

50 posted on 02/24/2003 2:27:21 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
As far as I know, just evolution.

umm... this one's too easy!
51 posted on 02/24/2003 2:28:14 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
good question... one which has no answer. Since creation myths are a dime a dozen. geeze, even the bible has a couple competing ones!

Montessori science // insanity --- evolution!

Brainwashing (( Truth // conservatism )) --- Indoctrinating (( liberalism // lies )) !!

"Fraud --- corruption" !

52 posted on 02/24/2003 2:28:34 PM PST by f.Christian (( + God *IS* Truth + love *courage*// LIBERTY *logic* *SANITY*Awakening + ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
Oops. I'm a Tenn. native, and in the hills, "hey" is a universal substitute for "hi". I take it by the tone of your subsequent posts that you were not sending along a greeting when you initially said "hey atlaw."

I'm not criticizing, by the way, or pontificating. I'm asking. And I figured you'd have a general idea. No offense intended.
53 posted on 02/24/2003 2:29:19 PM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The studies that we call evolution, biology, physics, astronomy, etc., are the studies of how, in part at least, He did it.

I don't really see much of a conflict unless you try to tell me all this happened only 4000 years ago. That, I don't believe at all.
54 posted on 02/24/2003 2:29:43 PM PST by libertylover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
"Montessori science // insanity --- evolution!

Brainwashing (( Truth // conservatism )) --- Indoctrinating (( liberalism // lies )) !!

"Fraud --- corruption" !

"

Do try to make sense, please, f.Christian. Your unorthodox punctuation and lack of verbs make your words incomprehensible. If you wish to communicate, please do so in English. Thanks very much.
55 posted on 02/24/2003 2:29:57 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
I guess Mr. Newton is just some old folgie too, isn't he.
56 posted on 02/24/2003 2:30:55 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Y'all can teach inteligent design in schools if you want, It won't bother me, but don't try to pass it off as Science.

Science is the study of how things work when there is no supernatural action.
Inteligent design might even be correct, but it can never be science. Call it theology, that's what it is.

So9

57 posted on 02/24/2003 2:31:46 PM PST by Servant of the Nine (Republicans for Sharpton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel and Fire and Stone
However, Darwinists can't tolerate dissent

yawn. come up with some good science which is "dissenting" to evolution, and you've got plenty of magazine covers, funding, and heroic status ahead of you. We're all waiting. The fact is no creationist has ever put forth anything other than picayune critiques or evolution, twisted quotes, lies, absurdities, and tricks. the scientific world is very cold and calculating, come up with something valid, then we'll talk.
58 posted on 02/24/2003 2:32:18 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
Darwinism and the Law

Berkhof speaks for many Christian theologians when he argues that evolution and theism are not compatible:[121]

This [theistic evolution] has often been called derisively a ‘stop-gap’ theory. It is really a child of embarrassment, which calls God in at periodic intervals to help nature over the chasms that yawn at her feet. It is neither the Biblical doctrine of creation, nor a consistent theory of evolution, for evolution is defined as ‘a series of gradual progressive changes effected by means of resident forces’ (Le Conte). In fact, theistic evolution is a contradiction in terms. It is just as destructive of faith in the Biblical doctrine of creation as naturalistic evolution is; and by calling in the creative activity of God time and again it also nullifies the evolutionary hypothesis.[122]

59 posted on 02/24/2003 2:32:44 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"old folgie "

Huh? Newton? What does he have to do with anatomy? You may remember that Newton revolutionized Physics, not biology. Time for a refresher course, I guess.
60 posted on 02/24/2003 2:32:47 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 741-756 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson