Posted on 02/26/2003 6:23:19 AM PST by Fury
ALBANY - Elimination of all sports, music and adult education programs, larger classes and sharp cuts in transportation were among options Buffalo school officials presented to state lawmakers Tuesday as targets for cutbacks if more state financial aid is not available.
"The results will scar our children and your cities at a time when New York cannot afford further scars," Buffalo Board of Education member Donald Van Every told a joint fiscal panel of the State Legislature.
Besides plans such as school closings and four-day weeks, already floated to deal with what Van Every said is now a $68 million budget gap, he presented options being considered if school financing cuts proposed by Gov. George E. Pataki are not reversed.
"It's meant to be a realistic list if the budget were adopted, as is, today," Van Every, chairman of the Conference of Big 5 School Districts, said before testifying before a Senate and Assembly budget panel.
The list included:
Larger classes with one teacher for every 30 students, up from the present 1:27 ratio.
Layoffs of guidance counselors.
Cuts to a 27-member group that tries to keep attendance up.
Elimination of programs like summer school, band and all extracurricular activities.
Cutbacks in school maintenance.
Bus transportation for only those students who live more than two miles from their school.
Reductions in bus aides and clerical staff.
Elimination of contracts for school improvements.
The district now gets more than $300 million from Albany, or more than 80 percent of its budget. Unlike suburban districts, though, city school districts can't independently raise taxes to make up for the funding cuts.
Joining Buffalo officials in sending warnings about Pataki's $1.24 billion proposed cut in aid to education were top officials from school districts, teacher unions and parent groups, all of whom said education is getting hit too hard in the governor's plan to deal with the state's soaring deficit.
State Education Commissioner Richard Mills said New Yorkers face a "nightmare situation" of deep cuts in public school programs coupled with higher property taxes if Pataki's plan is not rejected.
And Bishop Henry J. Mansell, of the Buffalo Catholic Diocese, warned that Catholic schools across New York risk not being able to comply with the state's tougher high school graduation standards unless Albany provides more money to private schools for children who need extra tutoring. Catholic schools are now voluntarily complying with the Board of Regents program that requires high school students to pass Regents exams in five subjects in order to graduate.
Mansell said that while Pataki is proposing $1 million for a program that provides teachers and other assistance to students who need extra help, $10 million is needed.
Mansell also urged lawmakers to provide money to private schools for computer equipment and teacher-training programs - funding that now goes exclusively to public schools. And he again urged lawmakers to permit tax credits or vouchers to give more parents the financial opportunity to send their children to private schools.
To make up for the $1.24 billion cut, local property owners would be asked by school districts to cover the hit, leading to what fiscal experts say would be widespread double-digit tax hikes this year.
"I'd rather be providing more funds to schools. But we're asking everyone to look for ways to operate more efficiently," Pataki said Tuesday. The state faces an $11.5 billion budget deficit over the next 13 months.
Later, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, D-Manhattan, said that Democrats would "at least" restore the education cuts that Pataki proposed. Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, R-Brunswick, has long said education and health-care restorations would be the Senate's top priorities.
Pataki will not be running for Gov or Senator in NYS. Period.
The thing is that Pataki does not want to raise personal or corporate income taxes. That's fine, but what he fails to realize from the "Joe Everyman" perspective is that the sales taxes, school taxes, and county taxes keep going up and up.
I've talked with several friends who are now seriously considered moving out of state. The taxes, high insurance, increase of crime in rural areas are all making it less attractive to live in this state. The country areas, at least to me, are beautiful. But what good is it if you continue to have a decrease in disposable income, year after year, even if you are making more at your job each year?
School districts, by means of various programs, are trying to be surrogate parents to our children I suppose. But the costs to run the programs is an issue. In years past you used to hear people say "Oh, State Aid will help pay for that". It's about time people not be so confident in making that statement.
The only item on the list which I see should be kept is music. There have been numerous studies recently which show that music helps the analytical and mathematical side of the brain. Many mathematics whizzes are also good at music. But football - forget it.
I would like to see them get rid of free breakfast (what kind of parent cannot feed their children in the morning?), and put tighter restrictions on the free lunch programs which so many people take advantage of. However, I do agree 100% with you that those darn teacher unions are the biggest obstacle to any budget. There are teachers I know who are rotton to the core and should have left the profession years ago, however, with tenure and benefits galore, they stay! Guidance counselors are a waste of money and half the people in Administration positions do nothing but push paper all day! I wish people of this State would realize that once you got rid of some of these positions, it really would not make a difference in their childs education. There is too much BLOAT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.