[Mr. Mojo]

Great post.

Serious bookmark material.

[robertpaulsen]

I think I see where the problem lies. Resolution 242 states (in part): "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict"

But that doesn't mean "all" territories. It doesn't say "all". Got it.

Resolution 242 further states (in part): "Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area.."

But then, surely, that doesn't mean "all" states of belligerency, does it?

See? Doesn't that clarify Resolution 242 for everybody? Both sides are living up to the agreement. What's the problem?

[backhoe]

Cross-link:

-Answers for Anti-Israeli, anti-Jewish Propaganda --

[fella]

The PC crowd will be thrown into conniption fits over the facts and truths cotained in this post. We should spare no effort in bringing it to their attention.