Skip to comments.
Vice President Cheney can order an immediate vote to confirm Miguel Estrada
Back to Basics forthe Republican Party ^
| February 28, 2003
| Michael Zak
Posted on 02/27/2003 8:11:30 PM PST by Grand Old Partisan
Another card for the Republicans to play is for Vice President Cheney to assert a long-dormant power as President of the Senate. The last time this was done was by Vice President Nixon, who ordered the 1957 Civil Rights bill directly to the Senate floor, by-passing the Judiciary Committee. How do I know this? I wrote Back to Basics for the Republican Party http://www.republicanbasics.com/ The book is a history of the GOP from the Republican point of view.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; estrada; filibuster; frist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Grand Old Partisan
That would be great!!!!
2
posted on
02/27/2003 8:14:12 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Leave the monkeys alone.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
The Democrats would howl like stuck pigs. It would be cool.
To: Grand Old Partisan
what happened to the first thread from 20 minutes ago?
To: Grand Old Partisan
Great idea. Where can you buy the book? Please freepmail information.
Gives me thought: If this can be done at any time, maybe they're just toying with the rats.
5
posted on
02/27/2003 8:17:00 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Grand Old Partisan
If this is true - it will have made my week - which has been particularly knarly!!
7
posted on
02/27/2003 8:17:58 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( Yo! Syracuse)
To: Grand Old Partisan
My book, "Back to Basics for the Republican Party", is a history of the GOP from the Republican point of view. My presentations to Republican groups often get standing ovations. I'm Standing.
Does Bill Frist know this?
8
posted on
02/27/2003 8:18:20 PM PST
by
bigdog
To: Grand Old Partisan
Does the Republican senate leadership know this? If not, perhaps someone in a position to do so should call it to their attention.
I agree. They can bitch and moan all they like, but if the Democrats pull a once-in-a-lifetime fast one, there's no reason why the Republicans should refrain from doing the same thing.
They have to do something. Letting the Democrats win this one certainly won't make the next one any easier.
9
posted on
02/27/2003 8:19:09 PM PST
by
Cicero
To: Grand Old Partisan; BartMan1
I'm all for this, but not before we beat the Dems over the head with Estrada for being duplicitous, race-baiting, two-faced weasels.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
10
posted on
02/27/2003 8:22:09 PM PST
by
IncPen
To: Grand Old Partisan
Go for it!! Bust their Chops.
Break their Spirits.
So9
To: Grand Old Partisan
Go for it!! Bust their Chops.
Break their Spirits.
So9
To: Grand Old Partisan
Go for it!! Bust their Chops.
Break their Spirits.
So9
To: Grand Old Partisan
I don't believe you.
prove this can be done.
what part of the constitution STATES that we can do this.
article, section please.
ONE precedent, without the constitutional context does not mean we can do this. I WISH it did.
What was your theory as to why we can. I damnedstraight KNOW why we should...
Don't blow smoke up our noses and then NOT tell us about how and why this is so. If we could do this WHY have we not already done so?
please... get back to the details POSTE HASTE.
14
posted on
02/27/2003 8:30:39 PM PST
by
Robert_Paulson2
(Mr. 29a... needs to be convicted.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
ordered . . . directly to the Senate floor, by-passing the Judiciary Committee. I'm not sure this would apply in this case. The nomination has already been voted out of committee and is on the Senate floor.
The issue at the present time is the need for 60 votes for cloture to end discussion and bring this to a vote. If the Rules allow the president of the senate to bypass the cloture requirement than it would solve the fillabuster issue.
Can you tell us more about this specific power? Would it apply to the issue of cloture?
15
posted on
02/27/2003 8:34:40 PM PST
by
B-bone
To: Grand Old Partisan; mhking
The last time this was done was by Vice President Nixon, who ordered the 1957 Civil Rights bill directly to the Senate floor, by-passing the Judiciary Committee. Wow, I didn't know that! I've heard the efforts from Rush, Sean, and others to remind us it was the Republicans that actually made the civil rights legislation happen, but I had no idea the Republicans had to go to this extent.
I can hear the new message now! "The last time the RATs pulled this filibuster obstructionism was to stop the Civil Rights bill. It took Tricky Dick (said lovingly) to free the bill. Here they go again!"
16
posted on
02/27/2003 8:37:18 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: NonValueAdded
You think that's surprising, check this out:
[Jackie Robinson] met privately with both candidates, and was disappointed when Kennedy honestly told him that, being from Massachusetts, he didn't know much about the problems of black people. Someone who had been in Congress for as long as Kennedy had, Robinson reasoned, should make it his business to know about the problems of black people. Therefore, by default, Robinson threw his support to Richard Nixon and campaigned for Nixon in the general election. He later wrote that it was important for blacks to have representation in both political parties so their support would not be taken for granted.
Robinson soon came to regret his decision to support Nixon. The most immediate result was that he was pressured to take a leave of absence from his job as a columnist at the New York Post, a liberal newspaper. Robinson was also soon disappointed by Nixon's inaction on civil rights issues. When Martin Luther King was jailed in Georgia late in the campaign, Kennedy quickly moved to secure King's release while Nixon did nothing. Robinson fired off a letter of protest to Nixon, but received no substantial reply, and Nixon lost the election days later.
From Jackie Robinson in Politics and the Civil Rights Movement.
To: Robert_Paulson2
what part of the constitution STATES that we can do this. I don't believe this is a constitutional power. This is a little-known Senate procedural rule -- if I read the post correctly.
18
posted on
02/27/2003 8:58:03 PM PST
by
BfloGuy
(The past is like a different country, they do things different there.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
Have you Emailed Rush and Sean about this?
Any response from the RNC?
19
posted on
02/27/2003 9:03:10 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson