Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'What If?' Iraq Dilemma Faces Oscar Planners [For Hollywood, worse case scenario: U.S. victory]
Reuters ^ | Saturday, March 1, 2003 | By Jill Serjeant

Posted on 03/01/2003 8:41:50 AM PST by JohnHuang2

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Hollywood is putting the final touches on its annual Oscar extravaganza while wondering whether one of the ritziest shows on earth will go on.

The ballots have been mailed, the gowns are being fitted and the golden statuettes have been cast for the March 23 Oscar ceremony -- around the time many analysts believe the United States and its allies could be at war with Iraq.

The unspoken "What if?" dilemma facing Hollywood is whether war will wait until after the Oscar red carpet is rolled out, and whether the curtain will go up if it does not.

"It is mind-boggling enough to put the thing on in the first place," said Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences spokesman John Pavlik. "There's not a whole lot of advantage in trying to plan for every conceivable scenario and whether to cancel or postpone."

"Did the war start three weeks ago? Did it start today? Did we win already? Or are we smack in the middle of some bloody thing? We'll do whatever looks like the right thing to do, but there's no way to plan for this," Pavlik told Reuters.

The Oscar ceremony, the movie industry's most prestigious event, has been postponed on only a handful of occasions in its 75-year-long history, none of them to do with the outbreak of war -- after a 1938 flood in Los Angeles, after the April 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King and after the March 1981 shooting of President Ronald Reagan.

NOT AN EASY DECISION

Taking months of preparation and drawing a worldwide television audience of 1 billion, the star-studded night of glamour and glad-handing is unlikely to be canceled or postponed.

The ceremony is to air on the U.S. ABC television network, a unit of The Walt Disney Co .

But the wrong decision could provoke a backlash -- not just in the United States but in the eyes of a world already critical of American isolationism.

"It might look like Hollywood fiddling while Baghdad burns," said Tom O'Neil, author of "The Ultimate Guide to the Oscars."

"But you are also dealing with a business where the motto is that the show must go on. Historically speaking, Hollywood has served a key role in keeping America's spirits up, so there is almost a social obligation that they have to carry out."

O'Neil recalled the criticism when the Golden Globes movie award ceremony went ahead in Beverly Hills in 1994 just five days after an earthquake killed 61 people in Los Angeles.

"What'll I do if another one hits?" comic actor Robin Williams joshed to a reporter on the Golden Globes red carpet that year. "Stand near a lady who's had a face lift -- because it won't fall!"

U.S. television's annual Emmy awards ceremony was canceled twice in 2001 -- once after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington, and again weeks later as the United States launched its bombing campaign against Afghanistan.

Pavlik said the public mood would play a part in any decision. "We're of the country. We're not just sitting out here in Hollywood not being part of it," he said.

"If we are in a war where American boys and girls are coming back in body bags ... the mood of the country will switch pretty fast, and we have to be ready to react to it."

SECURITY CONCERNS

Academy officials have already said the budget for security at Hollywood's Kodak Theater will be double that of other years. Last year airspace was closed over Hollywood, concrete barricades blocked the theater entrance, and star-gazers had to apply weeks in advance for tickets in the bleachers outside.

So far there have been no reports of celebrities deciding not to attend out of security fears.

Cancellation of the Oscar ceremony is unlikely, Oscar-watchers say. Far more probable would be a scaled-down event, with stars encouraged to dress down and the more frivolous parties and balls put on ice, along with the champagne.

"To cancel would be a major move," said Dennis Broe, associate professor of media arts at Long Island University.

"I think the feeling among Americans would be that this is part of the American lifestyle that we are fighting to protect."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Saturday, March 1, 2003

Quote of the Day by dead

1 posted on 03/01/2003 8:41:50 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What are they worried about they are on the side of protecting dictators,they will be in a attack free zone.
2 posted on 03/01/2003 8:47:55 AM PST by linn37 (work my fingers to the bone and what do I get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37; JohnHuang2
What are they worried about they are on the side of protecting dictators,they will be in a attack free zone.

Just what I've thought about Hollywood, France and other pro-islam/anti-American people and places. If the ragheads hit THEM it would only damage their cause. They're not gonna hit their fellow-travellers, are they? ...Of course, maybe they would, knowing if they did, the surviving limp-wrists would say, "We deserved it, we are so bad, we feel so guilty..."

3 posted on 03/01/2003 9:01:30 AM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gg188
Of course, maybe they would, knowing if they did, the surviving limp-wrists would say, "We deserved it, we are so bad, we feel so guilty..."

Exactly..a la Robert Fisk of the U.K. Independent.

4 posted on 03/01/2003 9:04:49 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The show must go on? Who cares i wouldnt have watched it anyway. But Ill condemn the hell out of Hollywood if the go during the war.
5 posted on 03/01/2003 9:08:08 AM PST by cardinal4 (Hollywood celebs are not relevant to Foreign Policy or National Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Here's another thread that promotes a 'Rally for America'....Not in Oscar's Name.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/854379/posts

6 posted on 03/01/2003 9:09:50 AM PST by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Are the stars going to avoid French Champagne?

Will the stars be drinking California sparkling wines/champagne?
7 posted on 03/01/2003 9:11:01 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
"It might look like Hollywood fiddling while Baghdad burns," said Tom O'Neil

What, it doesn't already? And, a "wake up" to this guy...
I don't know about anyone else, but I won't watch the Oscars again, let alone go to the movies again until this behavior of "anti-America, anti-war" is stopped. It is bound to send a message to the over indulged, ego maniac assholes... The only thing I will watch for is "bombs over Bagdad!" (o.k. so I will read about the worst dressed at the affair!0
8 posted on 03/01/2003 9:26:47 AM PST by Terridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
... Historically speaking, Hollywood has served a key role in keeping America's spirits up, so there is almost a social obligation that they have to carry out."

What a howler this one is! Sucking up to Saddam, spouting off on foreign soil about how much they hate the US, calling our president a stupid racist warmonger - sure works to raise my spirits.

Pavlik said the public mood would play a part in any decision. "We're of the country. We're not just sitting out here in Hollywood not being part of it," he said.

Two howlers for the price of one! See above - if this is how they are "being a part of it", I wish they would all just move to France and be a part of it.

"I think the feeling among Americans would be that this is part of the American lifestyle that we are fighting to protect."

Methinks they have a severely overinflated sense of their own worth.

9 posted on 03/01/2003 9:32:19 AM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
May I do a little editing here?

Hollywood has served a key role in keeping Saddam's spirits up, in sending all the wrong signals -- giving our enemies an impression of disunity and irresolution in America.

Closer to the truth.

10 posted on 03/01/2003 9:35:59 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
But the wrong decision could provoke a backlash -- not just in the United States but in the eyes of a world already critical of American isolationism.

No, the world was mad at our "isolationism" before 9-11. Now they're mad at our "meddling" in international affairs. I.e., damned if we get involved, damned if we keep to ourselves.

11 posted on 03/01/2003 9:40:13 AM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
"I think the feeling among Americans would be that this is part of the American lifestyle that we are fighting to protect."

LOL..Sure entertainment is a part of life, always has been.
I'm sure not seeing my family off to fight so that you can sit there and pat yourselves on the back.

There are the big things like Freedom, Justice, Honor and Truth. Try them sometimes....
12 posted on 03/01/2003 9:41:03 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'd be concerned about a terrorist attack, if I were them.
13 posted on 03/01/2003 9:43:35 AM PST by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It is true that their pathetic rantings have given encouragement to the enemy, boosting sad-am 's ego, and making him more confident than he should be. Good, there are more for the right thing than there are criers of anti-war. Pride goes before a fall, and sad-am is very proud right now.
14 posted on 03/01/2003 9:45:40 AM PST by Hila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rocko
No need to worry about a terrorist attack. Hollywood is the terroists "useful idiots" just as they were communisms "useful idiots".

Historical footnote: Ronald Reagan fought the communists in the screen actors guild. During his tenure they were kept at bay.

Protest hollywood, boycott Oscar Advertisers. How about a change the channel boycott? Have peole sign a pledge not to watch the show as part of the boycott. I ploedge not to watch.
15 posted on 03/01/2003 10:15:41 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gg188
"...Of course, maybe they would, knowing if they did, the surviving limp-wrists would say, "We deserved it, we are so bad, we feel so guilty..."

Robert Fiske did exactly that.

16 posted on 03/01/2003 10:50:47 AM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'll repeat what I said last year when Hollywood fretted over the Academy Awards.

I'd love to see the show broadcast from an undisclosed location using those green night-vision cameras. Talk about reinforcing paranoia and self-importance!

-PJ

17 posted on 03/01/2003 11:02:11 AM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
No need to worry about a terrorist attack. Hollywood is the terroists "useful idiots" just as they were communisms "useful idiots".

Didn't New York City go with Gore in '00?

18 posted on 03/01/2003 11:10:25 AM PST by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hollywood has served a key role in keeping America's spirits up, so there is almost a social obligation that they have to carry out."

You have got to be kidding.

...this is part of the American lifestyle they are fighting to protect.

Yes, we must protect the coke-snorting anorexic cosmetic-surgery junkies whose hobbies are divorcing one another and sniggering about how "dumb" the president is. That's what we're trying to protect alright. Our sacred right to dress up nincompoops and bid them play make-believe.

19 posted on 03/01/2003 12:07:01 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Are the Oscars even relevant anymore?

I mean, who cares?
20 posted on 03/01/2003 12:20:13 PM PST by forktail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson