hillary! must be reading the polls.
1 posted on
03/03/2003 1:22:34 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: kattracks
She wants to take over the world!(she's a socialist)
2 posted on
03/03/2003 1:32:10 AM PST by
MEG33
To: kattracks
This is good news...for now. Perhaps we can gain a measure of support from the dim witted feminists now.
United we stand, divided we fall.
To: kattracks
Didn't I see that b---- on the floor of the Senate excoriating Bush the other day? Seriously, who is she kidding?
6 posted on
03/03/2003 2:24:13 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 7, Staterooms As Low As $510 Per Person For Entire Week!)
To: kattracks
This "female dog" flips & flops more than a fish out of water!
7 posted on
03/03/2003 2:47:35 AM PST by
Teetop
(democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
To: kattracks
One thing this proves is that SHE IS NOT GOING TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT! Most Democreeps don't want any of the Senators being for the war. That would be a mark against her if she ran and she knows that.
11 posted on
03/03/2003 3:38:00 AM PST by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
To: kattracks
Even though she's not running(HA!), HILLARY! has just joined Lieberman and Graham as moderate democratic candidates.
Edwards is spending too much time attacking Bush and thinks it's 2004 already.
Kerry bashed Bush on Afgahnistan and is keen on wind-power and wind-up cars for the masses.
Dean is a socialist, anti-war cheerio from... VERMONT! Gephardt is... Gephardt.
Sharpton is a smart and cunning racist. Mosely-Braun asks, What am I doing here?.
But HILLARY!... God pound her, plans to be in the game while the stooges duke it out in the primaries.
12 posted on
03/03/2003 3:47:31 AM PST by
johnny7
(You know, 4 years ago, I said that I would serve out my full term. But today, I have been called...)
To: kattracks
"Sen. Clinton fully supports the steps the president has taken to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction," However, during Mrs. Clinton's reign as co-president, she couldn't have cared less about WMD or terrorism. She's reinventing herself to suit her ambitions again.
14 posted on
03/03/2003 4:02:34 AM PST by
Kathleen
To: kattracks
The beast needs to stand up on the Senate floor and state her support for the President so that the media can record her words - not go through a spokesman.
To: kattracks
The fact that Hillary Clinton is in The United States Senate proves that the war on terrorism is not over.
18 posted on
03/03/2003 4:23:51 AM PST by
PGalt
To: kattracks
Fashion conscious democrats to lockstep over, 'cause Hillary knows the way the wind blows...
20 posted on
03/03/2003 4:31:04 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: kattracks
Fashion conscious democrats need to lockstep over, 'cause Hillary knows the way the wind blows...
21 posted on
03/03/2003 4:32:28 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: kattracks
Fashion conscious democrats need to lockstep over, 'cause Hillary knows the way the wind blows...
22 posted on
03/03/2003 4:32:29 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: kattracks
The grifters pushed the rest of the party to attack the president on the war issue and then they stood back to reap the expected outrage by real americans.
To: kattracks
Its all in how you define "fully supports".
28 posted on
03/03/2003 4:58:52 AM PST by
right way right
(I Love the smell of fried liberal brains in the morning!)
To: kattracks
She says this oughtta one side of her mouth and then supports oughtta the other side because she probably is somehow in the middle of France Germany Russia and China NOT backing us.
To: kattracks
"Sen. Clinton fully supports the steps the president has taken to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction," said Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines. That puts Clinton (D-N.Y.) squarely at odds with a majority in her own party, where one recent poll found an Iraq attack is opposed by 66 percent of "core Democrats."
Anyone misreading this as support for an attack as Deborah Orin has (who should know better), needs be whacked over the head with a pile of "lost/misplaced/magically reappeared" billing records. Fully supporting unnamed steps means diddly. Are those steps working to get UN support? Are those steps taking out anti-aircraft positions in the no-fly zones? Are those steps stating that destroying Al Samoud missiles is a ploy and instead, we'll be doing the disarming?
Now today, she'll go to this arsenal, take credit for some sort of federal largesse coming their way, make the same type vague remarks about supporting what is going on, have the locals stand behind her for a photo op, including those who claim they hate her but turn out because the largesse speaks louder than principle, and the spin will be that she's pro-attack, pro-military and Boobus New Yorkus and Boobus America will swoon a little more for her.
Hopefully she won't be too close to Albany because I don't have enough duct tape to keep her vileness from seeping into my place.
31 posted on
03/03/2003 5:04:35 AM PST by
Dahoser
(Hitlery for President...of the prison bake sale committee.)
To: kattracks
This leftist bag of sh*t knows she has to "remake" her image if she is to have any future chance of winning a presidential run. Unfortunately for the wife of the serial sexual predator, rapist, and sink emperor, all the lipstick in the world won't make the lying pig she is look any better. Once a jack-booted lefty, always a jack-booted lefty.
32 posted on
03/03/2003 5:05:57 AM PST by
Cautor
To: kattracks
Apparently the wind is blowing pretty hard towards war
37 posted on
03/03/2003 6:11:22 AM PST by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: kattracks
Ummmmm. Now I'm having second thoughts about war.
To: kattracks
Does anyone know when the Senate will be back in session?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson