Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson's unholy Sunday
PAGE SIX - New York Post ^ | 3/06/03 | RICHARD JOHNSON with PAULA FROELICH and CHRIS WILSON

Posted on 03/05/2003 11:35:33 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

MEL Gibson is furious at the New York Times over a story that will depict him as a pope-hating, conspiracy-minded cultist.

Gibson went on Bill O'Reilly's show in January claiming reporter Christopher Noxon was doing a "hit piece" on him and "digging into [his] private life . . . getting into [his] banking affairs . . . harassing [his] family, including my 85-year-old father."


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: melgibson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2003 11:35:33 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
....could revive the medieval charge that it was the Jews who killed Christ.

wow

the Times is lacking alot of history and Bible study!

2 posted on 03/05/2003 11:46:03 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (In those days... Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This guy sound like a real troublemaker. Page Six couldn't have thrown Sandy Kouffax into the mix here?
3 posted on 03/05/2003 11:54:27 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
4 posted on 03/05/2003 11:56:02 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"could revive the medieval charge that it was the Jews who killed Christ. "

No then who did it ?

What an idiot !

5 posted on 03/05/2003 11:56:19 PM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It was the Daily Snooze ( News, for those who don't know about the NYC terminology ) that printed Sandy's name, NOT the Post. The Post's page six, was a " blind item ". Now, Sandy and by extention, you , are blaming page six.
6 posted on 03/06/2003 12:00:28 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I heard Mel was also spewing that long-discredited theory about the attack on Pearl being the work of the Japanese.

Have I missed something in the record of Jesus' murder all these years? To whom devolves responsibility, according to 'modern' historians?

"...and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us (Jews), had condemed him to the cross,....."

Josephus

7 posted on 03/06/2003 12:00:50 AM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Gary Giuffré [...] says in the story that the film "will graphically portray the intense suffering of Christ, perhaps as no film has done before."

Can a film really do this? I don't see the point of making a film pretending to be able to give off a realistic reflection of the Biblical story (even if everyone is speaking Aramaic!) It's not possible.

8 posted on 03/06/2003 12:04:16 AM PST by Int (or almost always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Int
I hate it when I forget to move my tag line
9 posted on 03/06/2003 12:10:54 AM PST by Int
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Int
Gibson himself acknowledged the apparent futility of portraying the murder as it really was; but felt his rendering would be a lot more honest than the sanitized versions that are celluloid currency.

As to why, Gibson seems to be spiritually compelled to produce the thing. Perhaps it is a devine mission; perhaps he's just pissed about the misinformation passed-off as 'history'. [ibid.]

I saw the interview Mel did with O'Reilly. Mel got really angry about Noxon's trespasses; but O'Reilly called him on his pique, and intimated that his was not a very Christian attitude. In a wonderful moment of introspection, Mel admitted the truth of that....without admitting it. O'Reilly snagged him good! He's human.

10 posted on 03/06/2003 12:14:34 AM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Well, if you look at my post, I don't actually say Page Six said anything about Mr. Kouffax, I merely wonder why they didn't throw him into the mix.(In fairness to Mr. Kouffax the blind item was obviously pretty transparent)
11 posted on 03/06/2003 12:15:34 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Getting angry is a normal human emotion, and neither Christian nor unChristian, in my view. It is what we do about our anger that reveals whether we are Christian or not.
12 posted on 03/06/2003 12:19:52 AM PST by Judith Anne (The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
You are absolutely correct, wise one.

Gibson was angry; and , as a result of his anger, he obliquely threatened Noxon with retaliation...sort of a "he don't know who he's messin' with; he better watch it" sort of statement.

That's when O'Reilly snagged him. Mel was goin' down a bad road.

Hope that clarifies things.

13 posted on 03/06/2003 12:29:11 AM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Interesting. I guess he is an actor after all. But sorry, Mel, I'm still not going to see it.
14 posted on 03/06/2003 12:32:49 AM PST by Int
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Page Six has apologized, to Mr. Koufax. They're done with it and if you are a daily reader of this page, as I am, then you should know, full well, that they don't repeat themsleves nor carry things from day to day to day without some new news tidbit. :-)
15 posted on 03/06/2003 12:33:36 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
This is all crapola. I like Mel Gibson. And I would like to see the Church return to the solemnity and formalism of the old Latin Mass. A lot of Catholics would.
16 posted on 03/06/2003 12:34:55 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Thanks. Wish I'd seen the interview...*sigh* ;-D
17 posted on 03/06/2003 12:37:13 AM PST by Judith Anne (The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
Yes.
18 posted on 03/06/2003 12:37:40 AM PST by Judith Anne (The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
The Romans, Hellenisitic colonizers, their puppet Nabataian "king", and their hand-picked collaborationist Sanhedrin killed dozens of purported Messiahs and rebel leaders. That is a fact.
19 posted on 03/06/2003 12:42:03 AM PST by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Are you saying that the crowd calling for the release of the thief was Greek, Italian, and Gaul?
20 posted on 03/06/2003 1:18:14 AM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson