[Southflanknorthpawsis]

If this is true, it directly contradicts all the blather pouring out of the anti-war crowd, who continue to insist that there could not be any ties between Osama bin Ladin and Saddam Hussein

One thing that puzzles me is the line about how we will risk bringing terror upon ourselves if we attack Iraq/Saddam. Now how can that be if there are no ties between Saddam and terrorists?

Um........either the terrorists are all holding hands or they aren't. As usual, the libs want it both ways.

[honway]

One thing that puzzles me is the line about how we will risk bringing terror upon ourselves if we attack Iraq/Saddam

You make a very good point. Based on the assumptions of those that oppose war and deny Iraqi involvement in 9-11, if reprisals were forthcoming, we should have been attacked after liberating Afghanistan from the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

The terrorist network that attacked us on 9-11 appears to have refrained from reprisals after the liberation of Afghanistan, but that same network will surely respond to an attack on Iraq.

The proof of the Iraqi role will be costly, but irrefutable.