Posted on 03/09/2003 2:15:59 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Despite warnings from its own inspectors, the Miami-Dade County school district may have overlooked costly construction flaws in as many as 78 new schools and additions, even as it paid millions to the contractors and architects who turned in shoddy work.
Now, the district faces paying millions more to repair buildings riddled with defects and dangers.
From construction sites across the county, school building inspectors since the late 1980s repeatedly raised red flags, documenting everything from roof leaks to crumbling walls. They found live wires dangling in equipment rooms. Uneven stairwells. Walkways sloped to funnel rainwater into classrooms -- not drains. They found new roofs pierced by construction equipment and trash, and leaks in windows and doors that had not been sealed.
Still, the school system's construction staff accepted the buildings and quickly moved students and teachers in, despite growing concerns about widespread water leaks, which can create mold, mildew and indoor air quality problems. The defects, they promised, would be fixed.
But year after year, the repairs never came.
Now, the district is planning to spend an estimated $780,000 to diagnose water intrusion in new buildings. Millions more will likely be needed for repairs, and no one yet knows how many deficiencies will show up in electrical or safety systems or in the structure of the schools.
A Herald investigation last month detailed the problems that have long hounded the district's 15-year-old construction program, forcing students into schools that are crowded, outdated, dirty or unsafe.
Delays on dozens of projects, frequently caused by poor planning or errors made by architects and engineers, have cost students 84,951 days in lost construction time. And the school district has exceeded its budget on at least 39 of 44 new schools analyzed by The Herald.
Now, the district faces construction deficiencies even in its new buildings.
(Excerpt) Read more at miami.com ...
$6 Billion Crumbling Schools***Exacerbating the crisis: The school board repeatedly failed to rein in the troubled construction program and made key decisions that often went against the recommendation of the district's top staff. ''This is appalling,'' Miami Beach High School Principal Jeanne Friedman fumed as she walked across campus noting roof leaks, a broken air-conditioning system and classrooms that reeked of mildew. ``These kids only get one shot around.''
There was a time when the school system had a chance to forge ahead. In 1988, determined to ease crowding and revitalize schools, Miami-Dade County voters approved the bond referendum. Combining that money with other funding, the district had $1.6 billion, a colossal sum for a struggling urban system.
An analysis of financial reports shows that the School Board has actually received almost $6 billion since then to build, repair and maintain schools. The money has poured in through bond proceeds, state construction dollars, property taxes and other sources. Yet, building has not kept pace.
In 1988, the board promised to build 49 schools and renovate existing campuses. Today, the district boasts that it has opened 64 new schools, but one is a campus entirely of portables, seven were largely paid for before the referendum, and two were simply put into buildings that already existed. That means the district actually built 54 from scratch. It took the better part of 15 years, far longer than expected, and the district had not just $1.6 billion to spend -- but more than 3 ½ times that much.***
_____________________________________________
NEA's Political Activities Detailed [Excerpt]-- The National Education Association documents reviewed by The Associated Press provide a rare window into the internal workings of one of the most powerful unions in the country. The union said Thursday it believes it complied with the law. The documents state that the union since 1994 has budgeted or spent money from its general account -- funded by about $200 million a year in teachers' dues -- on activities ranging from recruiting teacher-friendly candidates to helping state affiliates raise political action committee funds. A July 1999 strategic plan states the union budgeted $4.9 million for the 2000 election for such things as ''organizational partnerships with political parties, campaign committees and political organizations. [End Excerpt]
___________________________________________
TEACHERS BACK DNC WITH MONEY, MUSCLE [Excerpt]--In Iowa, New Hampshire, and other key primary states, teachers knocked on doors, staffed telephone banks, and helped get out the vote for Gore. In New York, members of the United Federation of Teachers helped distribute more than one million fliers for Gore in one day. In Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Teachers Association contacted each of its 90,000 members three times by phone and by mail, urging them to vote for Gore over Bradley………….
The teachers and their unions have long been a force in American politics. From 1991 to 1999, for example, contributions to the Democratic Party from the NEA, AFT, and the Service Employees International Union, which includes some education workers, totaled $6.7 million, making teachers by far the party's biggest donor bloc, according to the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity. The largest single contributor to Democrats - the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees - gave $3.7 million in that period……..[End Excerpt]
I don't think you need to go there. Not that that isn't a crooked part of the business. Just that the entire industry is crooked. If it's a government contract, it's very likely crooked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.