Now They Tell Us: Why are Democrats who voted for war now siding with France?

Opinion Journal ^ | 03/10/03 | editorial board

[Pokey78]

President Bush's words and somber tone show that he believes America could soon be at war. So it is worth more than passing partisan interest that now is the time that the Democratic Party has decided to mount a coordinated assault against Mr. Bush's Iraq policy.

[Robert_Paulson2]

"We are not, let us stress, questioning the patriotism of any of these Democrats."

---

And why the HELL not!!!???
These men and women are traitors in the view of the VAST RIGHT WING in America... and not much more than filthy political whores to moderate, decent Americans that are NOT right wingers, or left.

These screws....
are loose and need to be replaced by some new ones that are not stripped bare by frequent MIS-THREADING aka: mis reading, of what the words "protect and defend" actually mean.

These festering cancerous lesions on the American arse, need surgical treatment, not salve to cover for their naked treason... (going to sadaam and coming back to say America is evil... like the puke masters from the pacific northwest... what's their names?).

The author does not want to question their patriotism?

Well about 28 percent of us DO...

and another 35 percent would if they were ever told what has been done in the name of the "pati-rotic demoncraptax party..."

excuse me while I go to the vomitorium...

[Sacajaweau]

Reading the entire Resolution is worthwhile. Please take the time. It will clear up a lot of thoughts.

P.S. Pelosi is the other side of the fence for Hillary (As Hitlery commands, which explains Pelosi's appointment). Watch all the calls between the two.

[kesg]

We are not, let us stress, questioning the patriotism of any of these Democrats.

Perhaps you should.

[Wild Irish Rogue]

There are two sentiments that I am getting so sick of hearing. The first is not questioning the patriotism of Democrats. How can one not question their patriotism?? They willingly and gleefully attempt to undermine and sabotage the Commander in Chief, every single day.Which affects the men and women of the military-can't have one,without the other.Democrats would sell our country down the river,in a heartbeat and most of us know it.Democrats are Julius and Ethel Rosenberg writ large.

The second sentiment is-There is no evidence linking Al Queda to Iraq. Whether there is or isn't,is not relevant. The logic that the only terror organization we have to fear in the future,is AQ,is short sighted and evil.Evil in the sense that one is knowingly trying to thwart the President's war on terror for cheap political reasons.

[1rudeboy]

bttt

[Gracey]

Now that they were reelected in NOvember they can say they can revert to their anti Bush rhetoric.

[kesg]

Now that they were reelected in NOvember they can say they can revert to their anti Bush rhetoric.

That's the bad news. The good news is the Democrats they are demonstrating, once again, why the electorate cannot trust them on national securities issues -- which, in the post-9/11 world, are arguably the most important issues regardless of what pollsters say people tell them.

[Gracey]

... which, in the post-9/11 world, are arguably the most important issues regardless of what pollsters say people tell them

. Of course. I wear a pin that says: "Never, ever trust Democrats with National Security.