Replies

I agree with you. I think Pat Buchanan suffers from the notion that our first President's views on getting involved in foreign affairs should be followed, but forgets how big the oceans were back then.

I wish they were still that big, and if so, I would probably agree with him, as I hate war, hate the way our boys have to fight and die, when we do nothing wrong.

But, alas, the oceans now are just little ditches, and therefore we have to be like the minutemen, and hop over these at the drop of an email in order to defend everything Geo. Washingtom fought for, and that is, our freedom from tyranny.

I really do not think Pat Buchanan is an anti-semite. I have no idea what is behind his views, but assume it is wishful thinking that we can remain uninvolved in the world.

The problem is that the world has changed so dramatically since WW2. These changes are going to be very difficult, if not impossible, to go thru without WW3.

We are in the early stages of that now, and while I do not read the Bible literally, I certainly can find a metaphor or two in Revelation that describes in the understanding of St. John what a difficult time we must endure.

So, sorry, Pat, there is no turning back.